期刊文献+

新科学对推动哲学社会科学和公共管理研究范式创新的启示 被引量:7

The Enlightenment of New Scientific Achievements for Social and Public Management Sciences Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文讨论研究范式的重要性、认知科学的发展历程、传统实证主义给社会科学和公共管理学科留下的困惑以及新科学发现带来的新启示。20世纪以来的生命科学、混沌力学和新量子力学的科学进展和新发现解释了我们过去实证研究中的许多困惑,给了我们突破19世纪以来以经典物理思维为主导的研究范式的启示。在面对未来的挑战下,突破线性思维、二元思维、等级思维和技术工具理性,丰富研究范式,改进研究方法,迎接新科学时代的人文和社会创新的新挑战,构建人文科学、社会科学、公共管理学科与自然科学互相支持、相互推动、互为制约的新关系,是新一代学人的重要使命。 The paper discusses the importance of research paradigms,reviews the developmental trajectory of cognitive science,the legacy and puzzles of traditional positivism for social sciences and public administration research,and the new scientific discoveries of chaos theory,life sciences research,and quantum physics.The author observes that these new scientific discoveries have actually enlightened us of new research paradigms that are more compatible for resolving social sciences problems.It is high time we made a break-through over the limitation of the traditional and classical paradigm however it had been successful,to embrace new thinking,and enrich our paradigmatic thinking to develop social sciences in the new technological era.After all,the advent of new scientific breakthroughs and new technology call for innovation in the way we think,research,and organize our social life and governance system.The future harmony of the human world depends up the balance and harmonious development of humanities,social sciences,and science and technology perse.
作者 蓝志勇 Lan Zhiyong(Center of Organizational Learning and Urban Governance Innovation,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期6-12,共7页 Chinese Public Administration
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金重大项目“国家治理现代化与行政管理制度体系创新研究”(编号:17ZDA104)
关键词 经典物理思维 量子力学 工具理性 国家治理 思维范式 classical physics thinking quantum physics instrumental rationality state governance paradigm
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献10

  • 1蓝志勇.大力发展哲学社会科学,推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化[J].公共管理评论,2019,1(3):49-58. 被引量:5
  • 2Earl R. Babbie. The Practice of Social Research. http://www, cengagebrain, corn/, 2012.
  • 3Larry B. Christensen, R. Burke Johnson, Lisa A. Turner. Research Methods, Design, and Analysis (11th Edition). Boston. Allyn & Bacon, 2010.
  • 4Cook, Campbell. Experimental and Quasi- ex- perimental Design. Springer, 1979.
  • 5William R. Shadish, Thomas D. Cook, Donald T. Campbell. Experimental and Quasi- Eaperimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2001.
  • 6Warren Eller, Brian J. Gerber, Scott E. Robinson. Public Administration Research Methods : Tools for Evaluation and Evidence--Based Practice. London.. Routledge, 2013.
  • 7Elizabethann O' Sullivan, Gary R. Rassel, Maureen Berner. Research Methods Jot Public Administrators (Sth Edition). Boston: Addison--Wesley, 2007.
  • 8Lan Zhiyong, Kathleen Anders. A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research. Ad ministration & Society, 2000(2) : 138--165.
  • 9John W. Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles:Sage,2013.
  • 10蓝志勇.全景式综合理性与公共政策制定[J].中国行政管理,2017(2):17-21. 被引量:32

同被引文献88

引证文献7

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部