期刊文献+

基于核心胜任力的“COX-SOAP”评价法在临床实践教学中的应用研究 被引量:2

Using core competence based COX-SOAP assessment in the lab sessions
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:以临床医生的核心胜任力为导向创建"COX-SOAP"评价法,为临床医学生的实践效果提供评价工具。方法:以本校2016级临床医学专业学生为研究对象,采用"COX-SOAP"评价法进行临床实践教学与评价。结果:"心肺查体"等指标的平均得分较高,"操作"等指标较低,而"主要症状和体征的描述"等指标在三周内有显著提升。结论:"COX-SOAP"评价法可在短期内提升学生的临床思维水平及临床实践能力,省时高效、可行性强、信度高,值得进一步的研究及推广。 Objective:Based on the core competence of clinicians,the"cox-soap"evaluation method is established to provide evaluation tools for clinical medical students.Methods:Taking 2016 clinical medicine students of our university as the research object,"cox-soap"evaluation method was used for clinical practice teaching and evaluation.Results:the average score of"cardiopulmonary physical examination"and other indicators was higher,while the"operation"and other indicators were lower,while the"description of main symptoms and signs"and other indicators were significantly improved within three weeks.Conclusion:"cox-soap"evaluation method can improve students’clinical thinking level and clinical practice ability in a short period of time.It is time-saving,efficient,feasible and reliable.It is worth further research and promotion.
作者 邬元曦 刘英超 赵蕾 陈晓彤 王丽 莫达瑜 吕伯东 陈卫建 Wu Yuanxi;LiuYingchao;Zhaolei(The Second Clinical Medicine School of Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University,Hangzhou310053,Zhejiang,China)
出处 《中国高等医学教育》 2020年第2期81-82,109,共3页 China Higher Medical Education
基金 2018年浙江省高等教育“十三五”第一批教学改革研究项目“临床医师‘岗位胜任力四维评价模型’的构建与实证研究” 2017年浙江中医药大学校级研究生重点教育教学改革项目“基于胜任力的‘四维医学考试评价体系’构建与实证研究(研究生教学质量保证与监督体系研究与实践)” 2017年浙江中医药大学校级一般教育教学改革项目“基于胜任力的‘四维医学考试评价体系’构建与实证研究”.
关键词 胜任力 “COX-SOAP”评价法 “COX”环 “SOAP”评分表 形成性评价 Competency "COX-SOAP"format "COX"ring "SOAP"format Formative assessments
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1杜治政.关于医学文化人类学的研究[J].医学与哲学,1995,16(1):1-4. 被引量:9
  • 2卡森.美国人文医学研究及教学[J].医学与哲学,1997,18(11):575-577.
  • 3Halperin E C, Perman J A, Wilson E A. Abraham Flexner of Ken tucky, His Report, Medical Education in the United States and Can ada and the Historical Questions Raised by the Report[J]. Aca demic Medicine, 2010,85 : 203 -- 210.
  • 4Calman K C. Medical Education.. Past, Present and future [M]. Edinburgh: Elsevier Publication, 2006.. 237.
  • 5Neville A J,Morman G. PBL in the undergraduate MD program at McMaster University: three iterations in three decades [J]. Aca- demic Medicine, 2007,82 (4), 370-- 374.
  • 6Donner R S,Bickley H. Problem based learning in American med- ical education: an overview[J]. Bulletin of Medical Library Associa- tion, 1993,81(3) :294-298.
  • 7Dolmans D, De Grave W, Wolfhagen I, et al. Problem based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research [J]. Medical Education,2005,39(7) :782--741.
  • 8Mueller P S. Incorporating Professionalism into Medical Educa tion:The Mayo Clinic Experience[J]. Keio Journal of Medicine, 2009,58(3) :133--143.
  • 9McClelland D C. Testing for competence rather than for Intelli- gence[J]. American Psychologist,1973,28(1) :1-14.
  • 10Epstein R M, Hundert E M. Defning and assessing professional competence[J]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2002. 287: 226--35.

共引文献93

同被引文献31

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部