期刊文献+

两种探针在牙周临床教学中的应用比较

Comparison of teaching effect of two types of probes in periodontal Clinical training
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较Florida探针系统和普通william探针在牙周临床教学中对硕士研究生牙周临床探诊教学效果的影响,探讨提高牙周临床教学效果的有效途径。方法:通过牙周探诊教学设计,从理论知识考核、接诊前培训及牙周探针测量三方面比较Florida探针系统和普通william牙周探针在临床牙周探诊教学中对硕士研究生牙周临床教学效果的影响。结果:Florida探针系统更有助于提高学生牙周临床操作的规范性、准确性和工作效率,加深对牙周病相关知识点理解和掌握,培养临床思维。结论:两种牙周探针应用比较,Florida探针系统可作为牙周临床探诊教学的有效工具之一,有助于提升研究生牙周探诊临床教学效果。 Objective:To compare the teaching effects of the Florida probe system and William probe in periodontal clinical teaching and to evaluate the training results of this two probes.Methods:Two probes of the Florida probe system and William probe were used to evaluate the teaching effects of periodontal probing in postgraduate students through basic theories test,preclinical training and periodontal detection aspects.Results:It showed that the Florida probe system was more conducive to improve the standardization,efficiency and accuracy of clinical periodontal procedure for students,to increase the understanding of periodontal disease and its related knowledge and to develop their clinical thinking.Conclusion:This study suggests that the Florida probe system is more useful for postgraduate student periodontal clinical training as a teaching tool to improve the periodontal teaching effect.
作者 贺慧霞 贾婷婷 张贤华 HE Hui-xia;JIA Ting-ting;ZHANG Xian-hua(Department of Stomatology,the First Medical Center,Chinese PLA General Hospital and Chinese,Beijing100853,China)
出处 《中华老年口腔医学杂志》 2019年第6期345-349,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Dentistry
关键词 牙周探针 教学 牙周探诊 periodontal probe teaching periodontal probing
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献43

  • 1康军,曹采方,沙月琴.Florida探针与普通牙周探针测量牙周袋深度的比较[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2005,19(2):120-122. 被引量:12
  • 2赵溪达,潘亚萍,赵雪,林莉.利用Florida探针评价牙周炎非手术治疗的疗效[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2007,25(3):253-256. 被引量:13
  • 3Listgarten MA.Periodontal probing:what does it mean?J Clin Periodontol,1980,7(3):165-176.
  • 4Van der Velden U.Probing force and the relationship of probing tip to periodontal tissues.J Clin Periodontol,1979,6(2):106-114.
  • 5Freed H,Gapper R and Kalkwarf K.Evaluation of periodontal probing forces.J Periodontol,1983,54(8):488-492.
  • 6Pihlstrom PL.Measurement of attachment level in clinical trials:probing methods.J Periodontol,1992,63:1072-1077.
  • 7Gibbs CH,Hirschffeld JW,Lee JG,et al.Description and clinical evaluation of a new computerized periodontal probe-the Florida Probe.J Clin Periodontol,1988,14(2):137-144.
  • 8Osborn JB,Stoltenberg JL,Huso BA,et al.Comparison of measurement variability using a standard and constant force periodontal probe.J Periodontol,1990,61(8):497-503.
  • 9Osborn JB,Stoltenberg JL,Huso BA,et al. Comparison of measurement variability in subjects with modrate periodontitis using a conventional and constant force periodontal probe.J Periodontol,1992,63(4):283-289.
  • 10Hull PS,Cerehugh V and Ghassemi-Aval A.An assessment of validity of a constant force probe in measuring probing depth.J Periodontol,1995,66(10):848-851.

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部