摘要
如果说处罚是苦涩的,那么由《行政处罚法》第30-33条所构建的行政处罚减免制度则折射出人性的温暖和关怀。这种温暖和关怀蕴含在支撑处罚减免制度的法律父爱主义、后果判断理论、责任能力理论和主观过错归责理论等法理之中。比如,关于特殊个体行政违法的减免之规定,闪烁着法律父爱主义的关怀;关于“无后果不处罚”和“首违不罚”之规定,反映着后果主义判断理论在行政处罚法中的运用;以责任能力为“量罚”要件之规定,贯彻了法律责任能力理论;“主观过错”条款,则在行政处罚中嵌入了主观过错归责理论。
Though administrative penalty is punitive,the mitigation and exemption system constructed by Articles 30-33 of Law of the People’s Republic of China on Administrative Penalty reflects warm solicitude.The warmth is implied by the jurisprudential theories such as legal paternalism,consequentialism judgment,responsibility capacity theory,and the doctrine of liability fixation in subjective fault that supports the mitigation and exemption system.To be specific,the provisions on mitigation and exemption of administrative penalty for special individuals indicate the core of legal paternalism.Meanwhile,the provisions on“no penalty without harmful consequence”and“no penalty for first violation”inform the application of the theory of consequentialist judgement in the administrative penalty law.Also,the legal responsibility capacity theory is reflected in the provisions on measurement of severity.Last but not least,the doctrine of liability fixation in subject fault is embedded in the“subjective fault”provision.
作者
张倩
Zhang Qian(Institute of Taiwan Studies,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072)
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第6期48-60,共13页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“法律制度实施效果评估体系研究”(批准号:16JZD011)的相关成果。
关键词
法律父爱主义
后果判断
责任能力
主观归责
legal paternalism
consequentialism judgment
legal responsibility capacity
doctrine of liability fixation in subjective fault
