摘要
本文实证探讨了韩国语境下对行政能力概念的理解和变化。尽管各方对其重要性已达成普遍共识,但政治权威和利益相关者(在本研究中为:公众、国民议会成员和学术界)对行政能力的定义并不相同。为了增强对行政能力的理解,我们收集了三种类型的文本(2000年至2019年的337篇学术论文、1470篇国民议会会议记录和3316篇报纸文章),并使用主题建模和文本网络分析方法对数据进行了分析。结果表明,尽管学术论文强调领导力、人力、教育等决策能力,但是国民议会强调解决不同政策问题的创新能力,而被认为反映公共舆论的媒体则强调与国家安全相关的能力。
This article empirically explores the understanding and changes in the concept of administrative capacity in the Korean context.Despite a universal consensus on its importance,administrative capacity is defined differently by regimes and stakeholders(i.e.in this study:the public,members of the National Assembly,and academia).To improve our understanding of administrative capacity,we collected three types of texts(337 academic papers,1470 National Assembly minutes,and 3316 newspaper articles from 2000 to 2019)and analyzed the data using topic modeling and text-network analysis methods.The results suggest that although academic articles emphasized leadership,manpower,education,and other policymaking capacities,the National Assembly stressed innovation capacity in solving different policy problems.Finally,the media,assumed to reflect public opinion,emphasized capacities related to national security.
作者
柯康
朴贤熙
董哲心
金京东
毕占方(译)
熊缨(审校)
Kilkon Ko;Hyun Hee Park;Chul Shim Dong;Kyungdong Kim;Zhanfang Bi(Seoul National University,South Korea;Kookmin University,South Korea;Korea University,South Korea;不详)
出处
《国际行政科学评论（中文版）》
2021年第2期31-49,共19页
International Review of Administrative Sciences
基金
大韩民国教育部和韩国国家研究基金会(NRF-2016S1A3A2924956,NRF-2018S1A3A2075609)
关键词
行政能力
基于能力的人力资源管理
组织能力
文本分析
administrative capacity
competency-based human resource management
organizational capacity
text analysis
