摘要
永泰二年(766)初,經宰相元載提議,代宗下詔限制百官論事權,顔真卿撰《論百官論事疏》(以下簡稱《論疏》)辯其不可。這一事件産生的影響,以往有不同的看法。中村裕一認爲,通過這場“元載改制”.
In the second year of Yongtai永泰二年(766),Yuan Zai元載proposed to set up a procedure of submitting memorials of"officials of various departments-directors of various departments-Grand Councillor-emperor".This reform seemed to be conducive to the centralizing of power of Grand Councillor,but in fact,it was authorized by Emperor Daizong代宗.Yan Zhenqing顔真卿submitted the“Memorial on the Practice of Discussion of Officials”to express his disagreement on this reform.On one hand,he focused on the centralized power of the Grand Councillor,and on the other hand,he did not intend to fully safeguard officials’right to address memorials directly to the throne.Instead,Yan Zhenqing suggested reserving this right only to a few bureaucrats such as the directors of various departments,hoping to maintain the procedure of memorial submission under Secretariat-Chancellery since Xuanzong玄宗.Soon after the submission of this memorial,Daizong and Yuan Zai persisted in their version of reform in name of"full restoration of traditional practice"of the early Tang dynasty,suppressed the opinions of the faction of Yan Zhenqing,and restricted censors’right of impeachment.Yuan Zai not only solved the problem of excessive information caused by the opening of the channel of sealed matters(fengshi封事)but also provided a stable public opinion circumstance for the restoration and construction in the second year of Yongtai.It was not until the twelfth year of Dali大曆十二年(777)when Yuan Zai was executed,Daizong reopened channels of direct communication with his subjects.After that,Emperor Dezong德宗emphasized the Department of State Affairs as the status of the centre of information and devoted to developing the more private and less extensive face-to-face discussion.By establishing the doubleline channel,communication between the monarch and his subject was kept unimpeded.
出处
《唐研究》
2022年第1期379-392,共14页
Journal of Tang Studies
