摘要
公共政策在巴基斯坦的具体含义同各法域的主流认识相符,但巴法院不认可国际公共政策,违反实体类和程序类公共政策是违反巴基斯坦公共政策的两类典型情形。巴高等法院享有审查公共政策问题的专属管辖权。根据判例,巴法院必须严格适用公共政策,不得任意扩大公共政策的内容,仅在极其特殊情形下,才可适用公共政策拒绝执行外国仲裁裁决。在巴基斯坦,适用公共政策也不得违反终局性原则和正当程序之要求。公共政策直接关涉裁决能否在巴获得执行的问题,建议我国参与涉巴仲裁的相关主体对此予以高度重视和关注,以避免执行风险。巴法院解释公共政策的方法、对说理的要求以及对强制性法律规定和公共政策的区分实践,对我国公共政策仲裁司法审查的发展完善具有借鉴意义。
The concrete meaning of public policy in Pakistan is in line with the prevailing understanding in various jurisdictions,but Pakistani courts do not recognize international public policy,and violations of substantive and procedural public policy are the two typical categories of violations of Pakistani public policy.The Pakistani High Court has exclusive jurisdiction to review issues of public policy,which must be applied strictly by the courts and may not be arbitrarily expanded,and may be applied only in very exceptional circumstances to refuse enforcement of a foreign arbitral award.In Pakistan,public policy must also not be applied in violation of the principles of finality of arbitral award and due process.Public policy is directly related to the issue of whether an award can be enforced in Pakistan,and it is recommended that arbitral tribunals and arbitration parties pay great attention to this issue in order to avoid the risk of enforcement.The methods of interpreting public policy,the requirements of reasoning and the practice of distinguishing between mandatory legal provisions and public policy by Pakistani courts are of reference value to the development and improvement of judicial review of public policy of arbitral awards in China.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2023年第2期48-59,共12页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
喀什大学校级课题“‘中巴经济走廊’背景下巴基斯坦经贸领域重要立法整理与研究”(课题编号20221787)
喀什大学中巴经济走廊高质量发展研究课题“中巴国际民商事争议解决制度比较研究”(课题编号202101B)的研究成果
