摘要
关于窃取虚拟货币行为刑法定性,学界主要存在“数据犯罪说”与“财产犯罪说”两种主张。两种主张涉及的焦点问题是虚拟货币是否属于刑法中的财物,论者具体围绕虚拟货币的合法性与价值性问题展开探讨。在功能主义的刑法解释观和目的理性的刑法体系视野下,对虚拟货币财产属性的认识,无需在合法性与价值性问题上过度纠缠,而应在合目的的考量下,对虚拟货币是否具有作为财产保护的必要性展开分析。虚拟货币虽没有物理实体,但权利人可通过私钥对其实现支配。虚拟货币可成为占有的对象,窃取虚拟货币的行为应以盗窃罪论处。
Regarding the characterization of the criminal law of stealing virtual currency,there are two main propositions in the academic community:"data crime theory"and"property crime theory".The focus of the two propositions is whether virtual currency is property under the criminal law,and the commentators specifically discuss the legality and value of virtual currency.Under the functionalist view of criminal law interpretation and the perspective of the criminal law system of purposive rationality,the recognition of the property attributes of virtual currency does not need to be excessively entangled in the issues of legality and value,but should be analyzed under the consideration of purposefulness to analyze whether virtual currency has the necessity of property protection.Although there is no physical entity of virtual currency,the right holder can control it through the private key.Virtual currency can be the object of possession,and the act of stealing virtual currency should be punished as the crime of theft.
作者
罗树志
那晓燕
LUO Shu-zhi;NA Xiao-yan
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2024年第4期41-50,共10页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词
虚拟货币
盗窃罪
功能主义刑法解释观
事实性占有
规范性占有
virtual currency
burglary
functionalist view of criminal law interpretation
defacto possession
nor⁃mative possession
