摘要
从“跨越”到“重构”的学科建构、知识谱系内部“反思—批判—融合”的逻辑运演及理论与现实交织互融的批评实践是生态批评知识生产的主要路径。此路径彰显出一条从边缘出发反对中心,到跨越学科壁垒,再到边缘与中心相融合的嬗变轨迹。生态批评的知识生产在不断丰富与深化的同时,也暴露出重理论阐释轻批评实践、重“生态”轻“文学”与过度阐释之倾向等局限与不足。生态批评是一种具有光明前景、深远发展空间但远未完成的理论形态,需从三个方面予以关注:一是统筹好宏观与微观、理论研究与批评实践之间的应然关系;二是注重生态文学创作艺术性、审美性的考量与导引;三是合理把握生态文本生成的时空背景,避免过度阐释。对生态批评的知识生产路径予以梳理与反思,有望为生态文学的发展和研究打开新的可能与维度。
Knowledge production of ecological criticism is achieved mainly through disciplinary construction from“transcendence”to“integration”,logical operation of“reflection-criticism-integration”within the knowledge pedigree,and practice of criticism combining theory and reality.It develops along a path from revolting against center from periphery,to crossing borders of disciplines,and then to integrating periphery and center.While the knowledge of ecological criticism is increasingly enriched and deepened,limitations and shortcomings of its production are also gradually exposed,such as emphasis on theoretical interpretation over criticism practice,and“ecology”over“literature”,and tendency of over-interpretation.As a theoretical form with bright prospects of far-reaching development,ecological criticism is far from being fully developed.Three principles should be followed:firstly,coordinating the relationship between the macro and the micro,theoretical research and critical practice;secondly,attaching importance to the assessment and guidance of literary creations in the sense of their artistry and aesthetics;thirdly,understanding properly the context in which ecological texts generated while avoiding over-interpretation.It is believed that new possibilities and dimensions for the development and research on ecological literature might be brought by reviewing and reflecting on the route of knowledge production of ecological criticism.
作者
高春民
Chunmin GAO(Luoyang Normal University)
出处
《马克思主义美学研究》
2023年第1期52-65,438-439,共16页
Research on Marxist Aesthetics
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“‘空间融合’进程中的文艺学场域建构与知识路径”(16XZW005)
国家社会科学培育基金项目“中国新时期文学生态共同体研究”(2019-PYJJ-016)阶段性成果
关键词
生态批评
知识生产
路径
边缘
融合
反思
Ecological criticism
knowledge production
route
the periphery
integration
reflection