期刊文献+

基于VI-RADS评分比较不同MRI序列组合诊断肌层浸润型膀胱癌的效能 被引量:7

The Value of Different MRI Sequences Combination in the Diagnosis of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Based on Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨基于膀胱影像报告与数据系统(VI-RADS)比较不同MRI序列组合诊断肌层浸润型膀胱癌(MIBC)的效能。方法搜集经手术病理确诊的112例(共127枚瘤灶)膀胱癌患者资料。所有患者均于3.0T MR行T2WI、DWI及DCE序列扫描,由此形成3种序列组合:T2WI+DWI,T2WI+DCE,T2WI+DWI+DCE。根据VI-RADS评分标准分别对3种不同MRI序列组合进行评分。3种不同MRI序列组合VI-RADS评分在NMIBC与MIBC的差异性采用t检验进行比较。应用ROC曲线获得3种不同MRI序列组合诊断MIBC的曲线下面积(Az值),并计算相应的诊断敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果3种不同MRI序列组合VI-RADS评分在NMIBC与MIBC之间的差异均具有统计学意义(P值均<0.001)。以4分为最佳临界值,T2WI+DWI、T2WI+DCE、T2WI+DWI+DCE诊断MIBC的Az值分别为0.928、0.886、0.932,其中T2WI+DWI+DCE的Az值最大,T2WI+DCE最小。3种不同MRI序列组合中,T2WI+DWI+DCE诊断MIBC的敏感性和阴性预测值最高,T2WI+DWI诊断MIBC的特异性和阳性预测值最高。结论VI-RADS评分是一种较好的诊断MIBC的标准化、规范化方法。T2WI+DWI+DCE为诊断MIBC的最佳检查序列组合,T2WI+DWI可作为对比剂禁忌患者的优选方案。 Objective To evaluate the value of different MR sequence combination in the diagnosis of muscle invasive bladder cancer(MIBC)based on vesical imaging-reporting and data system(VI-RADS).Methods MRI data of 112 patients(127 tumors)with pathologically confirmed bladder cancer were retrospectively analyzed.3.0T MRI sequences were divided into three sequence combinations:T2WI+DWI,T2WI+DCE,T2WI+DWI+DCE.The three MRI sequence combinations were scored according to VI-RADS.The VI-RADS scores for the three MRI sequence combinations were compared using the t-test between NMIBC and MIBC.The area under the curve(Az)of the three MRI sequence combinations in diagnosing MIBC were assessed by using receiver-operating characteristic curves(ROC),and the corresponding sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value(PPV)and negative predictive value(NPV)were calculated.Results The differences of VI-RADS scores for the three MRI sequence combinations between NMIBC and MIBC were statistically significant(P<0.001).With a cutoff value of score 4,the Az value of T2WI+DWI,T2WI+DCE,T2WI+DWI+DCE for diagnosing MIBC were 0.928,0.886 and 0.932,respectively.Among the three MRI sequence combinations,T2WI+DWI+DCE had the highest sensitivity and NPV for the diagnosis of MIBC,and T2WI+DWI had the highest specificity and PPV for the diagnosis of MIBC.Conclusion The VI-RADS has good diagnostic power as a standardized method for evaluation of MIBC.T2WI+DWI+DCE is the best combination for the diagnosis of MIBC,and T2WI+DWI can be used as an alternative in patients with contraindications to contrast-use.
作者 张添辉 程凤燕 罗润标 朱文标 杨日辉 范伟雄 ZHANG Tianhui;CHENG Fengyan;LUO Runbiao(Department of MRI,the People’s Hospital of Meizhou,Meizhou,Guangdong Province 514031,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期725-729,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 磁共振成像 膀胱癌 膀胱影像报告与数据系统 Bladder cancer Magnetic resonance imaging Vesical imaging-reporting and data system
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献36

  • 1Caruso G, Salvaggio G, Campisi A, et al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced and gray-scale ultrasound[J]. AJR,2010,194(1) : 151-156.
  • 2Soloway M S. Editorial comment on zEAU guidelines on non-mus- cle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder [J]. Eur Urol, 2008,54(2):313-314.
  • 3Verma S,Rajesh A,Prasad S R,et al. Urinary bladder cancer:role of MR imaging[J]. Radiographics, 2012,32 (2) : 371 - 387.
  • 4Takeuehi M,Sasaki S,Naiki T,et al. MR imaging of urinary blad- der cancer for T-stagingz a review and a pictorial essay of diffu- sion-weighted imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013,38 (6) : 1299-1309.
  • 5Fandella A, Borghesi M,Bertaccini A. Renal cell carcinoma. 2002 TNM classification is still adequate? [J]. Arch Ital Urol Androl, 2009,81(1) :51-55.
  • 6Epstein J I,Amin M B,Reuter V R,et al. The World Health Or- ganization/International Society of Urological Pathology consen- sus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 1998,22(12) : 1435-1448.
  • 7Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder[J]. Eur Urol,2008,54(2) :303-314.
  • 8Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M, et al. Urinary bladder cancer: diffu- sion-weighted MR imaging-accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade [J]. Radiology, 2009,251 ( 1 ) : 112 - 121.
  • 9Vikram R,Sandler C M, Ng C S. Imaging and staging of transi- tional ceil carcinoma : part 1, lower urinary tract[J]. AJR, 2009, 192(6) : 1481- 1487.
  • 10Tekes A, Kamel I, Imam K, et aI. Dynamic MRI of bladder canc- er: evaluation of staging accuracy[J]. AJR, 2005,184 ( 1 ) : 121 - 127.

共引文献192

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部