摘要
我国民事诉讼中督促程序的利用率低,缺乏转入诉讼程序后的具体规定,督促程序的救济方式也不完善。对督促程序进行完善,应将形式审查作为支付令申请的审查方式。滥用异议权的行为是侵权行为,恶意债务人应赔偿债权人的损失。案件由督促程序转入诉讼程序时按照诉讼管辖确定管辖法院,无须设置更多时间给申请人用以补充诉讼材料。督促程序转为诉讼程序以申请人默示同意为标准。督促程序的被申请人对债权债务关系有异议,可以提起异议撤销之诉。
The application of the supervising procedure is not high in in the civil litigations in China.There is no specific provision applicable after the case is transferred from the supervising procedure to the litigation procedure.The remedy for the supervising procedure is not perfect.The formal examination shall be adopted in the examination of an application of payment order.The abuse of right of raising objection in the supervising procedure is in the nature of tort,and the malicious debtor shall compensate the creditor for all losses.When the case is transferred from the supervising procedure to the litigation procedure,the jurisdiction shall be determined according to regulations of the litigation jurisdiction,and there is no need to give more time to the applicant to supplement the litigation materials.The standard for the conversion of the supervising procedure to the litigation procedure is the implied consent of the applicant.The respondent in the supervising procedure who has any objection to the debtor-creditor relationship may file an action for cancellation of objection.
作者
吴俐
王蕾蕾
WU Li;WANG Leilei(Law School of Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306)
出处
《海大法律评论》
2020年第1期482-495,共14页
SMU Law Review
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“伦理学视阈下的生育权平衡研究”(16SFB5009)
关键词
督促程序
支付令
审查
救济
supervising procedure
payment order
examination
remedy
