摘要
现存的投资者与国家争端解决机制因透明度不高、裁决不一致等问题而引发诟病。欧盟据此提出了投资法庭制度。然而,因为欧洲一体化趋势的不断增强,欧盟投资法庭制度方案的提出存在着与欧盟法冲突的兼容性问题。投资法庭制度并不是替代目前投资者与国家争端解决机制的最优方案。本文从分析欧盟投资法庭制度设立缘由出发,深入分析兼容性问题和未来将面临的困境,在分析对中国的启示后提出了相应的完善建议,认为只有设立多元化的投资争端解决机制方可适应世界发展趋势。
The existing investor state dispute settlement mechanism has been criticized for its low transparency and inconsistent decisions.According to this,the EU put forward the investment court system.However,due to the increasing trend of European integration,the proposal of EU investment court system has the compatibility problem with EU law conflict.The investment court system does not replace the optimal solution of the current investor state dispute settlement mechanism.Based on the analysis of the reasons for the establishment of the EU investment court system and the compatibility issues and the dilemma ahead,analyze the enlightenment to China,this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the system.
出处
《欧洲法律评论》
2020年第1期184-195,共12页
Chinese Journal of European Law
关键词
欧盟
投资法庭制度
兼容性
完善
European Union
Investment Court System
Compatibility
Perfection
