摘要
目的:比较腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术(LAVH)与开腹全子宫切除术(TAH)的临床效果。方法:对我院2005年3月至2007年12月有全子宫切除指征的腹腔镜辅助下阴式全子宫切除术60例(腹腔镜组)和经腹全子宫切除术60例(开腹组)的临床资料进行回顾分析,比较两种术式的手术时间、术中出血量、排气时间、住院时间、术后镇痛剂使用等情况。结果:腹腔镜组排气时间(34.9±12.6)h显著短于开腹组的(52.6±11.7)h(P<0.05);腹腔镜组住院时间(4.5±1.2)d显著短于开腹组(6.3±1.2)d(P<0.05);腹腔镜组术后镇痛3例,显著少于开腹组35例(P<0.05)。两组在术中出血量和手术时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:LAVH具有创伤小、腹腔内环境干扰小、恢复快等优点。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).Methods Aretrospective analysis was done concerning clinical data of random of 60 ca- ses ofLAVH (Laparoscopic Group) and 60 cases of TAH (Open Group) from Mar.2005 to Dec.2007 in our hospital.Relative items of operating time,blood loss,time to first passing flatus,length of hospital stay and postoperative analgesic requirement happened the two groups were compared resp...
出处
《实用医技杂志》
2008年第13期1646-1648,共3页
Journal of Practical Medical Techniques
关键词
腹腔镜
全子宫切除术
开腹手术
阴式
Laparoscopy
Total hysterectomy
Abdominal operation
Vaginal
