期刊文献+

64-row multidetector computed tomography portal venography of gastric variceal collateral circulation 被引量:19

64-row multidetector computed tomography portal venography of gastric variceal collateral circulation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To study characteristics of collateral circulation of gastric varices (GVs) with 64-row multidetector computer tomography portal venography (MDCTPV).METHODS:64-row MDCTPV with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and a scanning field from 2 cm above the tracheal bifurcation to the lower edge of the kidney was performed in 86 patients with GVS diagnosed by endoscopy. The computed tomography protocol included unenhanced,arterial and portal vein phases. The MDCTPV was performed on an AW4.3 workstation. GVs were classified into three types according to Sarin's Classification. The afferent and efferent veins of each type of GV were observed.RESULTS:The afferent venous drainage originated mostly from the left gastric vein alone (LGV) (28/86,32.59%),or the LGV more than the posterior gastric vein/short gastric vein [LGV > posterior gastric vein/short gastric vein (PGV/SGV)] (22/86,25.58%),as seen by MDCTPV. The most common efferent venousdrainage was via the azygos vein to the superior vena cava (53/86,61.63%),or via the gastric/splenorenal shunt (37/86,43.02%) or inferior phrenic vein (8/86,9.30%) to the inferior vena cava. In patients with gastroesophageal varices type 1,the afferent venous drainage of GV mainly originated from the LGV or LGV > PGV/SGV (43/48,89.58%),and the efferent venous drainage was mainly via the azygos vein to the super vena cava (43/48,89.58%),as well as via the gastric/splenorenal shunt (8/48,16.67%) or inferior phrenic vein (3/48,6.25%) to the inferior vena cava. In patients with gastroesophageal varices type 2,the afferent venous drainage of the GV mostly came from the PGV/SGV more than the LGV (PGV/SGV > LGV) (8/16,50%),and the efferent venous drainage was via the azygos vein (10/16,62.50%) and gastric/splenorenal shunt (9/16,56.25%). In patients with isolated gastric varices,the main afferent venous drainage was via the PGV/SGV alone (16/22,72.73%),and the efferent venous drainage was mainly via the gastric/splenorenal shunt (20/22,90.91%),as well as the inferior phrenic vein (3/23) to the inferior vena cava. CONCLUSION:MDCTPV can clearly display the afferent and efferent veins of all types of GV,and it could provide useful reference information for the clinical management of GV bleeding. AIM:To study characteristics of collateral circulation of gastric varices (GVs) with 64-row multidetector computer tomography portal venography (MDCTPV).METHODS:64-row MDCTPV with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm and a scanning field from 2 cm above the tracheal bifurcation to the lower edge of the kidney was performed in 86 patients with GVS diagnosed by endoscopy. The computed tomography protocol included unenhanced,arterial and portal vein phases. The MDCTPV was performed on an AW4.3 workstation. GVs were c...
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第8期1003-1007,共5页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by The Science Technology Program of Beijing Education Committee, No. KM200810025002
关键词 Computed tomography Portal venography Gastric varices Portal hypertension Collateral circulation Computed tomography Portal venography Gastric varices Portal hypertension Collateral circulation
  • 相关文献

同被引文献118

引证文献19

二级引证文献114

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部