期刊文献+

时变传播规则下的危机信息ISKS-ISK两阶段传播模型及仿真 被引量:3

The ISKS-ISK model of crisis information dissemination under time-varying communication rules
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了真实信息和谣言在传播结构和时序上的不均匀性,发现危机信息在社会传播网络上的传播规则是时变的.提出了时变传播规则下危机信息的ISKS-ISK两阶段传播模型.通过仿真发现,网络规模对危机信息传播影响很小,而初始传播节点数量、信息传播率、权威渠道发布真实信息的时间是影响危机信息传播速度和范围的主要因素.因此,从源头控制传播者数量、尽早通过权威渠道发布危机真实信息是减少危机中谣言危害的有效举措. The ununiformity of the dissemination structure and timing of real information and rumors was analyzed,and it was found that the rules of the crisis information spreading on the social communication networks are time-varying.A two-stage crisis information propagation model named ISKS-ISK was established.The simulation results show that network size has little effect on the crisis information dissemination,while the number of the initial spreaders and the time when the authority channel started to propagate the real information have a great impact on the pace and scope of crisis information dissemination.Therefore,controlling the number of the rumor propagators from the source and making the authority channels release the real crisis information as soon as possible are very effective methods for reducing the threat of rumors.
出处 《中国科学技术大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期985-990,共6页 JUSTC
关键词 危机信息 时变传播规则 ISKS-ISK两阶段模型 仿真 crisis information time-varying communication rules ISKS-ISK model simulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献52

共引文献204

同被引文献45

  • 1谢力.从信息处理角度看应对危机[J].技术经济与管理研究,2004(6):34-35. 被引量:15
  • 2李长江,徐静,苏繁.供应链节点企业间的信任及实现机制[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(2):89-91. 被引量:23
  • 3Wang S J,Huff L C. Explaining buyers responses to sellers violation of trust [ J ]. European Journal of Marketing, 2007,41 (9-10) :1033-1052.
  • 4East R. Complaining as planned behavior[ J]. Psychology and Marketing, 2000, 17(12): 1077-1095.
  • 5Kim P H , Ferrin D L, Cooper C D, et al. Removing the Shadow of Suspicion :The Effects of Apology Vs Denial for Repairing Ability- VS Integrity-based Trust Violations [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89 ( 1 ) :104-118.
  • 6Ferrin D L, Kim P H, Cooper C D, et al. Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for repairing integrity-and competence- based trust violations[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(4) : 893-908.
  • 7Kim P H, Dirks K T, Cooper C D. et al. When more blame is better than less: the implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based violation [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007,92(4) : 893-908.
  • 8Kim P H, Dirks K T, Cooper C D. The repair of trust : A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34(3) :401-422.
  • 9Tomlinson E C, Mayer R C. The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair[ J]. Academy of Management Review,2009, 34( 1 ) :85-104.
  • 10Gillespie N ,Dietz G. Trust repair after an organization level failure[ J]. Academy of Management Review, 2009, 34 (1) :127-145.

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部