期刊文献+

超声斑点追踪显像技术评价缩窄性心包炎患者左心室局部心肌收缩功能 被引量:3

Evaluation of regional myocardial systolic function of left ventricular in patients with constrictive pericarditis by two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的应用超声斑点追踪显像技术(STI)评价缩窄性心包炎(CP)患者左心室局部心肌收缩功能。方法采集26例CP患者左心室心尖位四腔切面、两腔切面、左心室长轴高帧频图像,测量左心室游离壁(前侧壁、下侧壁、前壁、下壁)心内、外膜下心肌各个节段的二维纵向收缩期应变峰值,并与37例正常人比较。结果 (1)CP患者左心室游离壁心外膜下心肌各节段纵向收缩期应变峰值较对照组明显减低(P<0.05),且绝大多数节段P<0.01;(2)CP患者左心室游离壁心内膜下各节段心肌纵向收缩期峰值应变与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论超声二维应变成像技术能够准确地定量评价CP患者左心室游离壁心内膜下及心外膜下心肌收缩功能,CP患者左心室游离壁心外膜下心肌纵向收缩期峰值应变减低,提示心外膜下心肌收缩功能受损。 Objective To evaluate regional myocardial systolic function of left ventricular in patients with constrictive pericarditis(CP)by two-dimensional speckle-tracking imaging(STI).Methods Study population consisted of 26 patients with CP and 37 normal control subjects.High frame rate two-dimensional images were recorded from the apical four-chamber view,two-chamber view and long-axis view of the left ventricle respectively.The peak systolic longitudinal strain of the left ventricle free wall was measured using 2D strain software,and the indexes were compared between the two groups.Results The epi-strain in patients with CP was significantly decreased,compared with those in the control group(P<0.05).No significant difference in the endo-strain was found between the control group and CP group.Conclusions STI could objectively evaluate the regional myocardial systolic function of left ventricular in patients with CP.The epi-strain in the left ventricle free wall has decreased in patients with CP,which means the epi-myocardial systolic properties of left ventricular are impaired in CP patients.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2011年第13期3732-3736,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
关键词 心包炎 缩窄性 心室功能 应变 斑点追踪 Pericarditis,constrictive Ventricular systolic function,left Strain Speckle-tracking
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Heimdal A,Stoylen A,Torp H,et al.Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography . 1998
  • 2Carcia M J,Rodriguez L,Ares M,et al.Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: Assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 1996
  • 3Lu XF,Wang XF,Cheng TO,et al.Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by quantitative tissue Doppler imaging. International Journal of Cardiology . 2009
  • 4Sengupta PP,Mohan JC,Mehta V,et al.Doppler tissue imaging improves assessment of abnormal interventricular septal and posterior wall motion in constrictive pericarditis. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography . 2005
  • 5夏家红,蒋雄刚,杜心灵,董念国,肖诗亮,张凯伦,孙宗全,杨辰垣.126例缩窄性心包炎的围手术期处理[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2007,36(3):397-399. 被引量:1
  • 6王洲,李健,任永凤,朱天刚.二维应变超声心动图的研究进展及临床应用[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(6):959-962. 被引量:25
  • 7Mirsky I,Parmley WW.Assessment of passive elastic stiffness for isolated heart muscle and the intact heart. Circulation Research . 1973
  • 8Sengupta PP,Mohan JC,Mehta V,et al.Accuracy and pitfalls of early diastolic motion of the mitral annulus for diagnosing constrictive pericarditis by tissue Doppler imaging. The American Journal of Cardiology . 2004
  • 9Ling LH,Oh JK,Schaff HV,et al.Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardiectomy. Circulation . 1999
  • 10Arnold MF,Voigt JU,Kukulski T,et al.Does atrioventricular ringmotion always distinguish constriction from restriction?A Dopplermyocardial imaging study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography . 2001

二级参考文献48

  • 1蒋文莉,郭瑞强,周青,郝力丹,周立明,陈金玲.应变率、射血分数及校正的Q-V峰值间期评价不同构型高血压患者左室收缩功能的比较[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(10):1503-1505. 被引量:5
  • 2杨颖,陈峰,张宝娓,齐丽彤,赵锋,何萍.二维应变对左心室整体应变与应变率的研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2006,22(7):1018-1020. 被引量:33
  • 3杨颖,陈峰,齐丽彤,赵锋,何萍,张宝娓.二维应变与组织多普勒评价心肌应变的对比研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2006,22(11):834-836. 被引量:22
  • 4熊莉,邓又斌,申屠伟慧,余芬,张芸,杨好意,张清阳.超声斑点追踪技术测量正常人二维应变的初步研究[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2007,16(5):373-376. 被引量:136
  • 5Langeland S,D' hooge J, Wouters PF, et al. Experimental validation of a new ultrasound method for the simultaneous assessment of radial and longitudinal myocardial deformation independent of insonation angle. Circulation,2005,112 : 2157-2162.
  • 6Notomi Y, Lysyansky P, Setser RM, et al. Measurement of ventricular torsion by two dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2005,45 : 2034-2041.
  • 7Hurlburt HM, Aurigemma GP,Gaaseh WH, et al. Direct ultrasound measurement of the 3 principal components of left ventrieular regional systolic strain. J Am Coil Cardiol,2006,47 : 116 A.
  • 8Mirsky I, Parmley WW. Assessment of passive elastic stiffness for isolated heart muscle and the intact heart. Circ Res, 1973,33:233- 243.
  • 9Sutherland GR, Di Salvo G, Claus P, et al. Strain and strain rate imaging:a new clinical approach to quantifying regional myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2004,17 : 788-802.
  • 10MICHAEL C,TROTER M D,KEITH C,et al.Pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction[J].Am Surg,1996,62(4):304-307.

共引文献159

同被引文献45

  • 1周立明,郭瑞强,周青,郝力丹.彩色多普勒超声对缩窄性心包炎和限制型心肌病的鉴别诊断[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2003,12(5):15-17. 被引量:8
  • 2Oh JK, Hatle LK, Seward JB, et al. Diagnostic role of Doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1994, 23 (1) : 154-162.
  • 3Klein AL, Cohen GI, Pietrolungo JF, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of re- spiratory variations in pulmonary venous flow. J Am Coil Cardiol, 1993,22(7) : 1935-1943.
  • 4Ha JW, Oh JK, Ommen SR, et al. Diagnostic value of mitral an- nular velocity for constrictive pericarditis in the absence of respira- tory variation in mitral inflow velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiog, 2002, 15(12) :1468-1471.
  • 5Ling LH, Oh JK. Dynamic variation of transmitral mid-diastolic flow in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2012,59(2): e3.
  • 6Tabata T, Kabbani SS, Murray RD, et al. Difference in the re- spiratory variation between pulmonary venous and mitral inflow Doppler velocities in patients with constrictive pericardltis with and without atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001,37 (3): 1936-1942.
  • 7Otto CM. Textbook of clinical echocardiography. 3rd ed. Philadel- phia: Saunders, 2004.
  • 8Veress G, Ling LH, Kim KH, et al. Mitral and tricuspid annular velocities before and after pericardiectomy in patients with con- strictive pericarditis. Cire Cardiovase Imaging, 2011,4 (10) : 399- 407.
  • 9Min PK, Ha JW, Jung JH, et al. Incremental value of measuring the time difference between onset of mitral inflow and onset of early diastolic mitral annulus velocity for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic pressures in patients with normal systolic function and an indeterminate E/E'. Am J Cardiol, 2007,100(2) : 326-330.
  • 10Sengupta PP, Mohan JC, Mebta V, et al. Accuracy and pitfalls of early diastolic motion of the mitral annulus for diagnosing con- strictive periearditis by tissue Doppler imaging. ] Am Coil Cardi- ol, 2004,93 (7) : 886-890.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部