摘要
Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the two different treatments by researching 135 cases with stress urinary incontinence.Methods From June 2006 to June 2010,135 patients with stress urinary incontinence were treated in Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital.91 cases of them were treated with low frequency electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy (Group A),and the other 44 cases were treated by improved transobturaor tension-free vaginal tape(TVT-O) and TVT-O (Group B).Then,we compared these two groups by whole recovery rate,recovery rate of patients with urge incontinence,charge of treatment and complication,respectively.Results Group B's recovery rate for stress urinary incontinence was 100%.Ⅰ degree stress urinary incontinence in Group A's recovery rate was higher;Ⅱ degree patients' recovery rate for stress urinary incontinence was lower;Ⅲ degree patients' recovery rate was 0%.Only 1 case showed abnormal urine stream;2 cases showed urinary retention,but the symptoms disappeared after the treatment.No significant complication in Group A.There were huge differences of the expense between the two groups.The effect in Group A for patients with urge incontinence was good,but there was no effect shown in Group B.Conclusions The two treatments are safe and effective for stress urinary incontinence,but there are existed prominent differences of the therapeutic efficacy between the two groups.
Objective The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the two different treatments by researching 135 cases with stress urinary incontinence.Methods From June 2006 to June 2010,135 patients with stress urinary incontinence were treated in Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital.91 cases of them were treated with low frequency electric stimulation and biofeedback therapy (Group A),and the other 44 cases were treated by improved transobturaor tension-free vaginal tape(TVT-O) and TVT-O (Group B).Then,we compared these two groups by whole recovery rate,recovery rate of patients with urge incontinence,charge of treatment and complication,respectively.Results Group B's recovery rate for stress urinary incontinence was 100%.Ⅰ degree stress urinary incontinence in Group A's recovery rate was higher;Ⅱ degree patients' recovery rate for stress urinary incontinence was lower;Ⅲ degree patients' recovery rate was 0%.Only 1 case showed abnormal urine stream;2 cases showed urinary retention,but the symptoms disappeared after the treatment.No significant complication in Group A.There were huge differences of the expense between the two groups.The effect in Group A for patients with urge incontinence was good,but there was no effect shown in Group B.Conclusions The two treatments are safe and effective for stress urinary incontinence,but there are existed prominent differences of the therapeutic efficacy between the two groups.
出处
《中华临床医师杂志（电子版）》
CAS
2011年第21期6336-6341,共6页
Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
