期刊文献+

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer:The state of the art 被引量:16

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer:The state of the art
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 At present time,there is evidence from randomized controlled studies of the success of laparoscopic resection for the treatment of colon cancer with reported smaller incisions,lower morbidity rate and earlier recovery compared to open surgery.Technical limitations and a steep learning curve have limited the wide application of miniinvasive surgery for rectal cancer.The present article discusses the current status of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer.A review of the more recent retrospective,prospective and randomized controlled trial(RCT) data on laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer including the role of trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery and robotics was performed.A particular emphasis was dedicated to mid and low rectal cancers.Few prospective and RCT trials specif ically addressing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection are currently available in the literature.Improved short-term outcomes in term of lesser intraoperative blood loss,reduced analgesic requirements and a shorter hospital stay have been demonstrated.Concerns have recently been raised in the largest RCT trial of the oncological adequacy of laparoscopy in terms of increased rate of circumferential margin.This data however was not conf irmed by other prospective comparative studies.Moreover,a similar local recurrence rate has been reported in RCT and comparative series.Similar f indings of overall and disease free survival have been reported but the follow-up time period is too short in all these studies and the few RCT trials currently available do not draw any def initive conclusions.On the basis of available data in the literature,the mini-invasive approach to rectal cancer surgery has some short-term advantages and does not seem to confer any disadvantage in term of local recurrence.With respect to longterm survival,a definitive answer cannot be given at present time as the results of RCT trials focused on long-term survival currently ongoing are still to fully clarify this issue. At present time, there is evidence from randomized controlled studies of the success of laparoscopic resection for the treatment of colon cancer with reported smaller incisions, lower morbidity rate and earlier recovery compared to open surgery. Technical limitations and a steep learning curve have limited the wide application of mini-invasive surgery for rectal cancer. The present article discusses the current status of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. A review of the more recent retrospective, prospective and randomized controlled trial (RCT) data on laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer including the role of trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery and robotics was performed. A particular emphasis was dedicated to mid and low rectal cancers. Few prospective and RCT trials specifically addressing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection are currently available in the literature. Improved short-term outcomes in term of lesser intraoperative blood loss, reduced analgesic requirements and a shorter hospital stay have been demonstrated. Concerns have recently been raised in the largest RCT trial of the oncological adequacy of laparoscopy in terms of increased rate of circumferential margin. This data however was not confirmed by other prospective comparative studies. Moreover, a similar local recurrence rate has been reported in RCT and comparative series. Similar findings of overall and disease free survival have been reported but the follow-up time period is too short in all these studies and the few RCT trials currently available do not draw any definitive conclusions. On the basis of available data in the literature, the mini-invasive approach to rectal cancer surgery has some short-term advantages and does not seem to confer any disadvantage in term of local recurrence. With respect to long-term survival, a definitive answer cannot be given at present time as the results of RCT trials focused on long-term survival currently ongoing are still to fully clarify this issue.
机构地区 Department of Surgery
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery》 SCIE CAS 2010年第9期275-282,共8页 世界胃肠外科杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 POSTOPERATIVE complications RECURRENCE rate TRANSANAL endoscopic MICROSURGERY Robotics Long-term outcome Prognosis RECTAL cancer LAPAROSCOPY Postoperative complications Recurrence rate Transanal endoscopic microsurgery Robotics Long-term outcome Prognosis Rectal cancer Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献67

  • 1Yoon Ah Park,Jung Man Kim,Sung Ah Kim,Byung Soh Min,Nam Kyu Kim,Seung Kook Sohn,Kang Young Lee.Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2010 (3)
  • 2Gunnar Baatrup,Thomas Borschitz,Christoffer Cunningham,Niels Qvist.Perforation into the peritoneal cavity during transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer is not associated with major complications or oncological compromise[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2009 (12)
  • 3Won-Suk Lee,Woo Yong Lee,Ho-Kyung Chun,Seong Hyeon Yun,Yong Beom Cho,Hae-Ran Yun.Curved cutter stapler vs. linear stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a pilot prospective randomized study[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 2009 (11)
  • 4Nikolaos Gouvas,John Tsiaoussis,George Pechlivanides,Nikolaos Zervakis,Anastasios Tzortzinis,Costas Avgerinos,Christos Dervenis,Evaghelos Xynos.Laparoscopic or open surgery for the cancer of the middle and lower rectum short-term outcomes of a comparative non-randomised study[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 2009 (7)
  • 5Wai Lun Law MS, FRCS (Edin), FACS,Jensen T. C. Poon MBBS, FRCS (Edin),Joe K. M. Fan MBBS, FRCS (Edin),Siu Hung Lo MBBS, FRCS (Edin).Comparison of Outcome of Open and Laparoscopic Resection for Stage II and Stage III Rectal Cancer[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology . 2009 (6)
  • 6Steven D. Wexner,Roberto Bergamaschi,Antonio Lacy,Jonas Udo,Hans Br?lmann,Robin H. Kennedy,Hubert John.The current status of robotic pelvic surgery: results of a multinational interdisciplinary consensus conference[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2009 (2)
  • 7Simon S. M. Ng FRCSEd (Gen),Ka Lau Leung MD, FRCS (Edin),Janet F. Y. Lee MD, FRCSEd (Gen),Raymond Y. C. Yiu FRCSEd (Gen),Jimmy C. M. Li FRACS,Anthony Y. B. Teoh MRCS (Edin),Wing Wa Leung MSc.Laparoscopic-Assisted Versus Open Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology . 2008 (9)
  • 8Michael A. Str?hlein M.D.,Klaus-Uwe Grützner M.D.,Karl-Walter Jauch M.D.,Markus M. Heiss M.D..Comparison of Laparoscopic vs. Open Access Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Analysis[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2008 (4)
  • 9Carlo Staudacher M.D.,Andrea Vignali M.D.,Di Palo Saverio M.D.,Orsenigo Elena M.D.,Tamburini Andrea M.D..Laparoscopic vs. Open Total Mesorectal Excision in Unselected Patients with Rectal Cancer: Impact on Early Outcome[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2007 (9)
  • 10Marco Braga M.D.,Matteo Frasson M.D.,Andrea Vignali M.D.,Walter Zuliani M.D.,Giovanni Capretti M.D.,Valerio Carlo M.D..Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer Patients: Outcome and Cost-Benefit Analysis[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2007 (4)

共引文献6

同被引文献55

引证文献16

二级引证文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部