期刊文献+

足叶乙甙软胶囊对比拓扑替康二线治疗晚期或复发食管小细胞癌的疗效分析

Response comparison of oral etoposide and intravenous drip of topotecan as second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent primary esophageal small cell cancer: a report of 41 cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较足叶乙甙软胶囊(VP-16)与拓扑替康(TPT)二线方案治疗晚期或复发食管小细胞癌的疗效和毒副作用。方法选择2002年1月至2010年1月年收治的进展或复发食管小细胞癌患者共41例,按治疗方法不同随机分为VP-16(n=21)和TPT组(n=20),VP-16组患者口服VP-16软胶囊100mg,连续14d,3周为一周期;TPT组静脉滴注TPT(1.25mg/m2),连续5d,每3周为1周期;每组患者均至少完成2周期化疗,对两组患者的疗效及不良反应进行对比分析。结果 VP-16组化疗客观有效率为23.8%,中位疾病进展时间3个月,中位生存时间40周,1年生存率为42.9%;TPT组客观有效率为15.0%,中位疾病进展时间3个月,中位生存时间38周,1年生存率35.0%;客观有效率及生存率比较两组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。VP-16组不良反应贫血、白细胞下降、血小板下降、恶心呕吐发生率显著低于TPT组,差异有统计学意义,而且VP-16组极少发生3~4级不良反应。结论口服VP-16软胶囊单药二线治疗晚期或复发食管小细胞癌疗效不低于TPT,并且不良反应发生率低,反应轻微。 Objective To compare the response and adverse effects of oral etoposide(VP-16) and intravenous drip of topotecan(TPT) as second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent primary esophageal small cell cancer. Methods From January 2002 to January 2010, 41 patients with advanced or recurrent primary esophageal small cell cancer were randomly divided into 2 groups, and received oral VP-16(100 mg, d1-d14) or intravenous drip of TPT(1.25 mg/m2, d1-d5) respectively with every 3 weeks as one cycle. Every patient received chemotherapy for at least 2 cycles. Response and adverse effects were compared between the two groups. Results The objective response rates were 23.8% and 15.0%, median survival times 40 and 38 weeks, 1-year survival rates 42.9% and 35.0% respectively in VP-16 and TPT groups. There were no significant differences in response rate and 1-year survival rate between the two groups(P>0.05). The incidences of adverse effects including anemia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting in VP-16 group were significantly lower than those in TPT group. Less 3-4 grade adverse effects occurred in VP-16 group. Conclusions The efficacy of VP-16 single-agent is not inferior to topotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or recurrent primary esophageal small cell cancer. The incidence of adverse effects of VP-16 is much lower than that of TPT.
出处 《消化肿瘤杂志(电子版)》 2010年第4期226-229,共4页 Journal of Digestive Oncology(Electronic Version)
关键词 足叶乙甙 拓扑替康 化疗 食管小细胞癌 Etoposide Topotecan Chemotherapy Esophageal small cell cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1van der Heijden HF,Heijdra YF. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma[J].Southern Medical Journal,2005,(03):345-349.
  • 2卢绪菁,孔颖泽,王建华.原发性食管小细胞癌的研究进展[J].世界华人消化杂志,2009,17(34):3519-3523. 被引量:18
  • 3Walenkamp AM,Sonke GS,Sleijfer DT. Clinical and therapeutic aspects of extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma[J].Cancer Treatment Reviews,2009,(03):228-236.doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.10.007.
  • 4Ku GY,Minsky BD,Rusch VW. Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction,review of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience[J].Annals of Oncology,2008,(03):533-537.
  • 5Brenner B,Tang LH,Shia J. Small cell carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract,clinicopathological features and treatment approach[J].Seminars in Oncology,2007,(01):43-50.doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2006.10.022.
  • 6Brenner B,Lang LH,Klimstra DS. Small cell cancer of gastrointestinal tract:a review[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2004,(13):2730-2739.doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.09.075.
  • 7Pantvaidya GH,Pramesh CS,Desphande MS. Smallcell carcinoma of esophagus:the Tata Memorial Hospital experience[J].Annals of Thoracic Surgery,2002,(06):1924-1927.doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04061-4.
  • 8朱江,何金涛,李强.50例原发性食管小细胞癌的临床特点和综合治疗[J].中国肿瘤临床,2007,34(8):444-446. 被引量:15
  • 9Yamashita H,Nakagawa K,Asari T. Concurrent chemoradiation alone with curative intent for limited-disease small-cell esophageal cancer in nine Japanese patients[J].Diseases of the Esophagus,2009,(02):113-118.doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00863.x.
  • 10Treat J,Huang C H,Lane SR. Topotecan in the treatment of replased small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status[J].Oncolgist,2004,(02):173-181.

二级参考文献42

共引文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部