摘要
目的:探讨不同气管插管在危重病抢救中的效果。方法:80例危重病人采用经口气管插管(OI)和纤支镜下经鼻气管插管(BNI),比较两者的用时、管径、留置时间及并发症。结果:BNI组插管用时长,管径较小,插管留置时间长,口腔护理时间短,差异有统计学意义。OI组口腔溃疡发生率高,差异有统计学意义,两组鼻窦炎的发生率相当。结论:纤维支气管镜引导下经鼻气管插管值得在危重病抢救中推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effect of two methods of tracheal intubation in critically ill.Methods Orotracheal intubation(OI) and nasotracheal intubation with bronchofibroscope(BNI) were used in 80 patients.The operating time,caliber,detaining time and complication were compared.Results In BNI,the operating time,detaining time was long,caliber was small,mouth care of time was short.The incidence of dental ulcer was high in OI.Conclusion BNI is worthy to use in critically ill.
出处
《求医问药（下半月）》
2013年第2期276-277,共2页
Seek Medical and Ask The Medicine
关键词
经鼻气管插管
经口气管插管
危重病
nasotracheal intubation
orotracheal intubation
critically ill
