摘要
斯托尔帕-萨缪尔森定理认为国际贸易会导致丰裕要素实际收入提高、稀缺要素实际收入下降。得出该结论的数学逻辑无懈可击,但和新古典经济学理论是矛盾的,和我国出口劳动密集型产品而劳动报酬占比下降的实践也是矛盾的。通过本文的重新解释,矛盾得以化解:国际贸易导致丰裕要素价格提高,不是因为该要素"丰裕",而是因为在资源配置过程中,该要素的稀缺性提高;稀缺要素价格下降,也不是因为该要素"稀缺",而是因为在资源配置过程中,该要素的稀缺性下降。我国劳动密集型产品出口迅猛增长而丰裕要素劳动报酬占比没有提高,其原因正在于劳动的丰裕性没有发生实质的变化。
Stolper-Samuelson Theorem states that returns to the abundant factor will go up and returns to the scarce factor will go down under increased international trade.Though the logic behind it is convincing,it contradicts the theories of neoclassical economics and the fact that China is labor-abundant but wage falls.This paper attempts to explain the contradiction:in resource allocation,the price of abundant factor rises because the factor becomes less abundant,and the price of scarce factor falls because the factor is less rare.The problem in China exactly shows that China is still labor-abundant.
出处
《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期15-24,134,共10页
Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
