期刊文献+

探究预制疲劳裂纹载荷对DH36药芯焊丝CO_2气保焊接头CTOD值的影响 被引量:1

Influence of maximum fatigue precracking force on CTOD value of DH36 flux-cored wire CO_2 protection welded joints
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 依据BS7448标准对DH36药芯焊丝气保焊接头进行了裂纹尖端张开位移(crack tip opening displacement,CTOD)试验,通过对接头进行组织、断口分析,同时对预制疲劳裂纹过程进行有限元模拟分析,研究不同预制疲劳裂纹最大载荷对CTOD值的影响.结果表明,预制疲劳裂纹最大载荷对CTOD试验结果影响很大.当预制疲劳裂纹最大载荷远小于BS7448标准规定的最大值时,试验过程易出现突跃,即pop-in现象,从而得到较小的CTOD值;反之,当预制疲劳裂纹最大载荷接近或超过BS7448标准规定的最大值时,pop-in现象减弱、延迟或者消失,得到较大的CTOD值.故而为了保证试验结果的可靠性,标准中应对预制疲劳裂纹载荷敏感的接头更严格的规定其最大值. CTOD tests were carried out for flux-cored gas protection welded joints of DH36 according to Standard BS7448.The effect of fatigue precracking force on the CTOD value was investigated by analyzing the microstructure and fracture surface of the joint and finite element simulation on the process of fatigue precracking. The results show that the maximum fatigue precracking force has a tremendous influence on CTOD value. When the maximum fatigue precracking force was less than the specified value in Standard BS7448,the test process was prone to pop-in phenomenon,and smaller CTOD value occurred. Conversely,when the maximum fatigue precracking force was close to or exceeding the specified value,the CTOD value would be larger. Thus the Standard should be strictly limited to the maximum fatigue precracking force to ensure the reliability of test results.
出处 《焊接学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期66-70,116,共6页 Transactions of The China Welding Institution
基金 天津市自然科学基金资助项目(09JCYBJC05100)
关键词 预制疲劳裂纹最大载荷 裂纹尖端张开位移 突跃 maximum fatigue precracking force crack tip opening displacement pop-in
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献15

  • 1陈剑虹,马杭,王国珍.C-Mn焊缝区缺口和裂纹试样的宏观断裂行为[J].甘肃工业大学学报,1990,16(4):30-37. 被引量:1
  • 2[2]BS 7448:Part2:1997, Fracture mechanics toughness tests. Part 1.Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J values of welds in metallic materials[ S ].
  • 3[3]BS 7448: Part 1:1991, Fracture mechanics toughness tests. Part 1.Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J values of metallic materials[ S].
  • 4DNV-OS-F101.Fabrication and testing of offshore structures[S].DNV:DNV Press,2010.
  • 5BS 7448 Part l&Part 2.Fracture mechanics toughness tests,part1.Method for determination of KIC,critical CTOD and critical Jvalues of welds in metallic materials[S].BSI:LSBU Press,1997.
  • 6Dawes M G.Quantifying Pop-in severity in fracture toughness test[J].Fatigue Fracture Engineering in Material Structures,1991,14(10),1007-1014.
  • 7Arimochi K,Isaka K.A study on Pop-in phenomenon in CTODtest for weldments[J].Transactions of the Japan Welding Society,1989,20(2):1-13.
  • 8Berejnoi C.An alternative method for small Pop-in assessment[J].Engineering Fracture Mechanics,1998,59(5):667-681.
  • 9BS 7448 : Part 1 : 1991 Fracture mechanics toughness tests, Part 1. Method for determination of K Ic, critical CTOD and critical J values of metallic materials.
  • 10BS 7448:Part 2:1997 Fracture mechanics toughness tests, Part 1. Method for determination of K Ic, critical CTOD and critical J values of welds in metallic materials.

共引文献12

同被引文献18

引证文献1

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部