研发网络边界拓展、知识基与创新追赶被引量：30

R&D network boundary spanning,knowledge base,and innovation catching-up

导出

摘要研发网络边界拓展已经成为研究热点。本文聚焦于转型经济的后发企业研发网络组织、地理和知识边界拓展对创新能力追赶的影响这一核心研究问题,整合制度理论和知识基础观理论,提出后发企业研发网络的组织边界拓展和创新绩效有着倒U型的关系。其次,后发企业研发网络地理边界拓展和技术创新绩效有着正向影响的关系。再次,后发企业研发网络知识边界拓展和技术创新绩效有着正向影响的关系。最后,企业内部知识基对后发企业研发网络组织边界拓展对创新绩效的影响存在调节作用。基于926家拥有浙江省高新技术研究开发中心的企业为样本两年数据的实证检验支持了本文的假设。 R&D boundary spanning has attracted a lot of attentions. The primly focus is on the mechanisms that drive innovation capability catching-up of latecomers in emerging market by R&D boundary spanning( i. e. Organizational,Geographical,and Knowledge). Integrating institutional theory and knowledge management theory,we propose that R&D organizational boundary spanning has an inversed U shape effect on innovation capability,while geographical and knowledge boundary spanning has positive effects on innovation capability. Moreover,knowledge base moderates the relationship between R&D boundary spanning and innovation capability.The data from a sample of 926 high-tech firms in China supports our hypothesis.

作者刘洋应瑛魏江杨洋

机构地区华南理工大学工商管理学院浙江财经大学工商管理学院浙江大学管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期915-923,共9页 Studies in Science of Science

基金浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(15NDJC115YB) 广东省自然科学基金项目(2014A030310492) 浙江省软科学研究项目(2014C35012)

关键词转型经济后发企业研发网络边界拓展创新能力 transition economy latecomer firms R&D network boundary spanning innovation capability

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献4

1刘洋,魏江,江诗松.后发企业如何进行创新追赶？--研发网络边界拓展的视角[J].管理世界,2013,29(3):96-110. 被引量：125
2魏江,应瑛,刘洋.研发网络分散化,组织学习顺序与创新绩效:比较案例研究[J].管理世界,2014,30(2):137-151. 被引量：87
3魏江,应瑛,刘洋.研发活动地理分散性、技术多样性与创新绩效[J].科学学研究,2013,31(5):772-779. 被引量：39
4刘洋,魏江,应瑛.组织二元性:管理研究的一种新范式[J].浙江大学学报（人文社会科学版）,2011,41(6):132-142. 被引量：50

二级参考文献188

1S. L. Brown & K. M. Eisenhardt," The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations,"Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1(1997) ,pp. 1 - 34.
2M. L. Tushman ~ C. A. O'Reilly,"Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change,"California Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (1996), pp. 8 - 30.
3S. Raisch, J. Birkinshaw & G. Probst, et al,"Organizational Ambidexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance,"Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4(2009), pp. 685 - 695.
4R. B. Duncan,"The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation,"The Management of Organization Design : Strategies and Implementation ,Vol. 1(1976) ,pp. 167 - 188.
5D. A. Levinthal & J. G. March,"The Myopia of Learning," Strategic Management Journal,Vol. 14(1993), pp. 95 - 112.
6J. G. March,"Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,"Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1991) ,pp. 71 - 87.
7S. Raisch & J. Birkinshaw," Organizational Ambidexterity.. Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators," Journal of Management ,Vol. 34,No. 3(2008), pp. 375 - 409.
8Z. Simsek, C. Heavey & J. F. Veiga, et al,"A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes ,"Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5 (2009), pp. 864 -894.
9J. W. Rivkin & N. Siggelkow," Balancing Search and Stability.. Interdependencies among Elements Organizational Design,"Management Science, Vol. 49, No. 3 ( 2003), pp. 290 - 311.
10P. S. Adler, B. Goldoftas & D. I. Levine,"Flexibility versus Efficiency? A Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System,"Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 1 ( 1999), pp. 43 - 68.