摘要
814名深圳大学学生使用SEEQ问卷中译本对体育教师进行体育教学效果评价 ,其中 186名大学生评价体育教师教学的“好”与“差” ,并以此与 72 4名香港大学生的测试结果进行比较。结果表明 ,SEEQ问卷具有较好适用性 ;深港两地学生对有效体育教学评价标准的认同比较一致 ,主要体现在体育教学热情和体育教学组织 ,但在学科价值、上课活力与风趣、做示范与教学水平的关系的认同程度略有差异。
Shenzhen University students are asked to use the Chinese Version of SEEQ instrument to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of their teachers of physical education. Among them,186 are asked to evaluate the teaching of “good” and “bad” teachers of physical education. The evaluation result is compared with that of 724 HongKong Universitystudents. It is found that the SEEQ instrument is good in applicability. Shenzhen students are well identified with HongKong students in evaluation standards of effective teaching. Concentrating on teaching enthusiasm and teaching organization. However,when it comes to the relationship between subject values,class dynamics and humor,exercise and teaching standards,there are slight differences among the students of the two regions.
出处
《湖北体育科技》
2004年第3期389-392,共4页
Hubei Sports Science
