期刊文献+

右房左室起搏治疗慢性心力衰竭伴室内传导阻滞患者的初步临床观察 被引量:9

Clinical Study of Right Atrial-Left Ventricular Pacing Therapy for Patients With Chronic Heart Failure
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 观察右房 左室起搏治疗慢性心力衰竭 (简称心衰 )的临床效果。选择 1 6例充血性心衰患者 (NYHA分级Ⅲ Ⅳ级 ) ,男 1 0例、女 6例 ,年龄 6 8.4± 6岁 ;均为窦性心律 ,合并有Ⅰ度房室阻滞 ,完全性左束支阻滞。按安置起搏器的模式分为右房 左室起搏治疗组 (LV组 ,n =6 ) ,右房双室起搏治疗组 (BiV组 ,n =1 0 )。左室起搏电极分别放置于心大静脉左室侧后分支 9例 ,心大静脉左室后分支 7例。观察起搏治疗前后左室心功能参数、6min步行距离、左室壁运动的同步性及体表心电图的变化。结果 :BiV组左室射血分数 (LVEF)由术前的 0 .2 3提高至 0 .31 (P <0 .0 0 1 ) ;在LV组LVEF由术前的 0 .2 4提高至 0 .33(P <0 .0 0 1 ) ;左室舒张末期容积指数在二组分别由术前的 1 4 9± 5 1ml/m2 和 1 5 3±5 3ml/m2 下降至 1 1 6± 38ml/m2 和 1 2 1± 4 1ml/m2 (P均 <0 .0 0 1 ) ;室间隔与左室后壁运动的延迟时间在二组分别由术前的 1 95± 94ms和 1 97± 89ms下降至 1 7± 6 0ms及 1 6± 5 6ms(P均 <0 .0 0 1 )。 6min步行距离则分别由术前的4 0 3± 5 3m和 4 0 1± 5 9m提高至 4 4 1± 6 2m和 4 4 2± 6 7m(P均 <0 .0 5 )。结论 :初步临床观察提示右房 左室起搏治疗与右房双室起搏治疗相比 ,同样可有效地改善慢性心衰? To study the clinical effect of right atrial left ventricular pacing therapy in patients with chronic heart failure,16 patients ,10 male and 6 female,mean ages of 72 years,with refractory chronic heart failure and left bundle branch block were investigated. All of them were sinus rhythms. The mean QRS width was 140~190 ms; The mean of left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF) was 0.23.10 of them received biventricular synchronous pacing(BiV group, n=10),6 of them received right atrial left ventricular pacing (LV group,n=6)and the coronary sinus lead was inserted into the branch of coronary sinus to pace left ventricular. Results:After biventricular synchronous pacing and right atrial left ventricular pacing, the heart function was significantly improved. In the BiV Group,the LVEF was increasd from 0.23 to 0.31( P<0.05). In the LV Group,the LVEF was increasd from 0.24 to 0.33( P<0.05);The left ventricular end diastolic volume index was decreased from 149±51 ml/m 2 and 153±53 ml/m 2to 116±38 ml/m 2及121±41 ml/m 2 respectively,(P<0.001).The the septal to posterior wall motion delay,a left intraventricular asynchrony parameter, was decreased from 195±94 ms(BiV group)and 197±89 ms(LV group) to 17±60 ms and 16±56 ms respectively(P<0.001).The 6 min walk distance increased from 403±53 m(BiV group) and 401±59 m(LV group) to 441±62 m and 442±67 m respectively(P<0.001).Conclusion:The right atrial left ventricular pacing therapy can improve hemodynamic effect in patients with chronic heart failure and left bundle branch block.
出处 《中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志》 2004年第3期175-177,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology
关键词 心血管病学 心力衰竭 充血性 左室起搏 起搏部位 Cardiology Heart failure, congestive Left ventricular pacing Pacing site
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1柳弘,张金荣,吕树铮,任学军.双心室起搏治疗充血性心力衰竭[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2003,17(3):192-194. 被引量:1
  • 2王冬梅,韩雅玲,荆全民,王祖禄,王守力,苗志林,臧红云.双室起搏治疗充血性心力衰竭近期疗效研究[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2003,17(6):445-446. 被引量:1
  • 3华伟,王方正,张澍,张奎俊,牛国栋,马坚,姚焰,陈柯萍,楚建民,陈新.心室再同步起搏治疗慢性心力衰竭伴室内传导延迟患者的近期观察[J].中华心血管病杂志,2003,31(1):21-23. 被引量:15
  • 4汪爱虎,孙宝贵,庄亚纯,金炜,汪芳,陈岗,庄文燕,薛吉祥.普通电极导线行右房左室或双心室起搏的初步临床观察[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2002,16(4):253-255. 被引量:2
  • 5Abraham W. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure:The Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation(MIRACLE)[J].Cardiac Failure,2000,6:369
  • 6Auricchio A,Stellbrink C,Sack S,et al.The pacing therapies for congestive heart failure (PATH-CHF)study:Rationale,design,and endpoints of a prospective randomized multicenter study[J].Am J Cardiol,1999,83:130D
  • 7Auricchio A,Stellbrink C,Sack S,et al. Long-term clinical effect of hemodynamically optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and ventricular conduction delay[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,39(12): 2 026
  • 8Pitzalis MV,Iacoviello M,Romito R,et al.Cardiac resynchronization therapy tailored by echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular asynchrony[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,40(9): 1 615

二级参考文献13

  • 1[1]Gras D,Mabo P,Tang T,et al.Multisite pacing as a supplemental treatment of congestive heart failure:preliminary results of the Medtronic Inc.InSync study[J].PACE,1998,21(11):2249
  • 2[2]Blanc JJ,Etienne Y,Gilaard M,et al.Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure[J].Circulation,1997,96:3272
  • 3[3]Kass DA,Chen CH,Curry C,et al.Improved left ventricular mechanics from acute VDD pacing in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular conduction delay[J].Circulation,1999,99:1567
  • 4[4]Mortensen PT,Nielsen JC,Jensen HK,et al.Improved success rate by using a standard pacing lead for permanent transvenous left ventricular pacing in heart failure[J].PACE,1999,22(6 Part II):A161
  • 5[5]De Cock CC,V Campen CMC,Vos DHS,et al.Left atrial and left ventricular-based single lead DDD pacing[J].PACE,2001,24(4):486
  • 6[6]Daubert JC,Ritter P,Le Breton H,et al.Permanent left ventricular pacing with transvenous leads inserted into the coronary veins[J].PACE,1998,21:239
  • 7[7]Ritter P,Gras D,Daubert C.Implant success rate of transvenous left ventricular lead in the MUSTIC trial[J].PACE,2000,23(4 Part II):580
  • 8Abraham WT. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure: the Muhicenter Insync Randomized Clinical Evaluation(MIRACLE) [ J ]. J Card Fail, 2000,6 ( 4 ) :369.
  • 9Ozdemir K, Altunkeser BB, Danis G, et al. Effect of theisolated left bundle branch block on systolic and diastolic function of left ventricle[J] .J Am Soe Echocardiogr,2001,14(11) :1 075.
  • 10Das MK, Cheriparambil K, Bedi A, et al. Prolonged QRS duration (QRS≥ 170ms)and left axis deviation in the presence of left bundle branch block : A marker of poor left ventricle systolic function [ J ] .Am Heart J,2001,142(5) :756.

共引文献14

同被引文献89

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部