期刊文献+

评欧美现代符号学源头中的相似之处 被引量:1

On the Similarities Between Saussure's Semiology and Peirce's Semiotics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 国内符号学研究往往把皮尔士和索绪尔分别当作现代符号学的两支源头,认为二者观点互不相干,然而经过仔细研究,二者的符号学观中却有惊人的相似之处,具体体现在其反对的对象、符号及符号学界定、符号意义、作用、分类、发展及符号的依赖关系上,了解这些相似点,有助于国际符号学交流,统一认识,推动符号学的发展。 Peirce and Saussure are often considered as two independent origins of modern semiotics without any likeness. However, after careful study, similarities arise between the two scholars' ideas on opposed theories, the definition of sign and semiotics, the meaning, classification, and functions of signs, and the depending relations between sign elements and signs. To understand these similarities will be helpful to the international semiotic communications, semiotic consensus and the development of semiotics.
作者 张良林
出处 《内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版)》 2004年第6期46-49,共4页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Minzu University:Social Sciences
基金 江苏省普通高校人文社会科学研究资助项目(02SJD740019)
关键词 皮尔士 索绪尔 符号学 相似点 Peirce Saussure semiotics:similarities.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]Peirce, C.S. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce,[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1931-1935.
  • 2[2]De Saussure, F.Course in Greneral Linguistics[M].London: Peter Owen, Ltd., 1959.
  • 3[3]费尔迪南,德·索绪尔.普通语言学教程[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
  • 4丁尔苏.论皮尔士的符号三分法[J].外国语文,1994,19(3):10-14. 被引量:51
  • 5张良林.皮尔士的符号学观述评[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),1999,3(1):56-58. 被引量:4

共引文献52

同被引文献7

  • 1张良林.皮尔士的符号学观述评[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),1999,3(1):56-58. 被引量:4
  • 2Peirce,C.S.Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce[M].Hartshome,ed.Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1931-1958.
  • 3Hanson,N.R.Patterns of Discovery[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1958.
  • 4Percy,W.The Message in the Bottle[M].New York:Straws and Giroux,1976.
  • 5Peirce,C.S.The Manuscripts of Charles.S.Peirce,1901[DB/OL].[2007-12-10].http://user.unifrankfult.de/-wirth/texte/nubiola.html.
  • 6Shank,G.D.Abductive Strategies in Educational Research[J].The American Journal of Semiotics,1987(5).
  • 7Shank,G.D.Shaping Qualitative Research in Educational Psychology[J].Contemporary Educational Psychology,1994(19).

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部