摘要
学界一般根据“题元指派一致性假设”用题元等级安排论元的句法实现,但问题是各家在题元等级的设置上并不一致。而且,论元实现时还会出现数目的增减与题元的倒置。为了解决论元的句法实现问题,“功能范畴假设”可能是一种思路。“功能范畴假设”认为功能范畴决定着移位与合并,包括论元的选择与题元的指派。这样一来,论元的增减与题元的倒置可以归因于扩展谓词的功能范畴,各家的题元等级其实也只是句法衍生过程的不同阶段的题元的线性次序。
Based on UTAH, some linguists have used thematic hierarchies to determine argument realization in syntax. However, the thematic hierarchies designed by different linguists are different. What’s more, the number of arguments may increase or decrease, and the position of themes may inverse in argument realization. The Functional Category Hypothesis assumes that the functional categories determine the movement and the merger, including argument selection and thematic assignment. So, the increase and decrease in arguments and the inversion in themes may be attributed to functional categories extending the matrix predicate. And as a matter of fact, the different thematic hierarchies reflect the linear orders of themes in different phases of syntactic derivation.
出处
《外国语》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第2期53-61,共9页
Journal of Foreign Languages
基金
安徽省教育厅项目"普遍语法与汉语致使句式研究"(2004sk046)
安徽师范大学博士科研基金"普遍语法与汉语句式研究"
关键词
论元
题元
句法
谓词
不一致
倒置
范畴
衍生
阶段
等级
argument realization
Functional Category Hypothesis
thematic hierarchy
UTAH
