期刊文献+

Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa 被引量:15

Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Aim: To 1) compare post-wash and post-thaw parameters of sperm processed with PureSperm density gradient technique and swim-up method; and 2) test the efficacy of two commonly available density gradient media PureSperm and ISolate. Methods: This prospective study used semen specimens from 22 patients. Specimens from nine patients were processed by both PureSperm density gradient and swim-up method. These specimens were then cryopreserved. Thirteen specimens were processed by both PureSperm (40 % and 80 %) and Isolate (50 % and 90 %) double density gradient techniques. The two fractions processed by both PureSperm and swim-up were analyzed for post-wash sperm characteristics. Post-thaw analysis was done after 24 hours. Sperm fractions obtained after processing with PureSperm and ISolate were compared for post-wash sperm characteristics and ROS levels. Results: Specimens prepared with PureSperm had significantly higher median total motile sperm counts (TMSC) (32.2 x 10~6 vs. 17.6 x 10~6), recovery rates (69.2 % vs. 50.0 %), and longevity at 4 hours (83.0 % vs. 55.0 %) compared to specimen prepared by swim-up. Post-thaw specimens also had a higher recovery and longevity at 4 hours with PureSperm as compared to the swim-up. Semen specimens processed by PureSperm had significantly higher total sperm count, TMSC, and percentage recovery rates (30.0 % vs. 19.7 %) than ISolate. Conclusion: Semen quality is better preserved in fresh and cryopreserved semen prepared with PureSperm density gradient compared to swim-up. A significant enrichment of sperm is observed with PureSperm compared to ISolate. Higher recovery rates of mature motile sperm obtained after PureSperm sperm preparation may be beneficial for successful ART. i Aim: To 1) compare post-wash and post-thaw parameters of sperm processed with PureSperm density gradient technique and swim-up method; and 2) test the efficacy of two commonly available density gradient media PureSperm and ISolate. Methods: This prospective study used semen specimens from 22 patients. Specimens from nine patients were processed by both PureSperm density gradient and swim-up method. These specimens were then cryopreserved. Thirteen specimens were processed by both PureSperm (40 % and 80 %) and Isolate (50 % and 90 %) double density gradient techniques. The two fractions processed by both PureSperm and swim-up were analyzed for post-wash sperm characteristics. Post-thaw analysis was done after 24 hours. Sperm fractions obtained after processing with PureSperm and ISolate were compared for post-wash sperm characteristics and ROS levels. Results: Specimens prepared with PureSperm had significantly higher median total motile sperm counts (TMSC) (32.2 x 10~6 vs. 17.6 x 10~6), recovery rates (69.2 % vs. 50.0 %), and longevity at 4 hours (83.0 % vs. 55.0 %) compared to specimen prepared by swim-up. Post-thaw specimens also had a higher recovery and longevity at 4 hours with PureSperm as compared to the swim-up. Semen specimens processed by PureSperm had significantly higher total sperm count, TMSC, and percentage recovery rates (30.0 % vs. 19.7 %) than ISolate. Conclusion: Semen quality is better preserved in fresh and cryopreserved semen prepared with PureSperm density gradient compared to swim-up. A significant enrichment of sperm is observed with PureSperm compared to ISolate. Higher recovery rates of mature motile sperm obtained after PureSperm sperm preparation may be beneficial for successful ART. i
出处 《Asian Journal of Andrology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第1期86-92, ,共7页 亚洲男性学杂志(英文版)
关键词 SPERMATOZOA CRYOPRESERVATION density gradient centrifugation sperm motility spermatozoa cryopreservation density gradient centrifugation sperm motility
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Chen M J, Bongso A. Comparative evaluation of two density gradient preparations for sperm separation for medically assisted conception. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 759-64.
  • 2Chan CC, Chen IC, Liu JY, Huang YC, Wu GJ. Comparison of nitric oxide production motion characteristics of sperm after cryopreserved in three different preparations. Arch Androl 2004; 50: 1-3.
  • 3Hammadeh ME, Kuhnen A, Amer AS, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W. Comparison of sperm preparation methods: effect on chromatin and morphology recovery rates and their consequences on the clinical outcome after in vitro fertilization embryo transfer.Int J Androl 2001 : 24: 360-8.
  • 4Claassens OE, Menkveld R, Harrison KL. Evaluation of three substitutes for Percoll in sperm isolation by density gradient centrifugation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:3139-43.
  • 5Saleh R, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and male infertility: from research bench to clinical practice. J Andro12002; 23: 737-52.
  • 6Mortimer D. Sperm preparation methods. J Androl 2000; 21:357-66.
  • 7Rogers B J, Perreault SD, Bentwood B J, McCarville C, Hale RW, Soderdahl DW. Variability in the human-hamster in vitro assay for fertility evaluation. Fertil Steril 1983; 39:204-11.
  • 8Yamamoto Y, Maenosono S, Okada H, Miyagawa I, Sofikitis N. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrepⅡ filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods.Andrologia 1997; 29: 303-10.
  • 9Aitken RJ, Clarkson JS. Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques. J Androl 1988; 9: 367-76.
  • 10Yogev L, Gamzu R, Paz G, Kleiman S, Botchan A, Hauser R,et al. Pre-freezing sperm preparation does not impair thawed spermatozoa binding to the zona pellucida. Hum Reprod 1999;14:114-7.

同被引文献60

引证文献15

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部