政府干预、经济自由与企业家精神被引量：15

Government Intervention,Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship

导出

摘要一般认为,政府干预对企业家精神是不利的。然而这个判断是否符合我国这样处于经济转型阶段的、由地方政府推动经济增长的国家?我们使用2000年中国大陆除西藏外30个省市的截面数据,运用SEM方法,考察政府干预、经济自由与企业家精神之间的关系,结果发现,政府干预虽然直接推动了企业家精神的增长,但阻碍了经济自由,最终阻碍了企业家精神的成长。因此,地方政府热衷于通过经济干预来培育企业家精神或许是错误的。要发展企业家精神,就必须减少政府干预,实现经济自由。 It is a common belief that government intervention has negative effect on entrepreneur-ship. Yet, whether it applies to our transforming economy, the increase of which depends on the local governments, deserves discussion. This analysis is based on the cross-sectional data of all the mainland provinces and municipalities directly under the Central Government (except Tibet) in 2000. U-sing SEM,We check up the relations among government intervention,economic freedom and entrepre-neurship, only to find that the government intervention has an immediate positive influence on entre-preneurship,but prevents economic freedom, hence a negative influence on entrepreneurship in the long run. Therefore we feel safe to conclude that it is bad for local governments to intervene to promote entrepreneurship, which virtually depends on less intervention and more economic freedom.

作者张晔

机构地区南京大学长江三角洲社会经济发展研究中心

出处《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第2期88-96,共9页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)

关键词政府干预经济自由企业家精神 government intervention economic freedom entrepreneurship

分类号 F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1刘志彪.竞争优势:基于企业家精神的分析框架[J].中国经济问题,2004(1):25-33. 被引量：13
2周黎安.晋升博弈中政府官员的激励与合作——兼论我国地方保护主义和重复建设问题长期存在的原因[J].经济研究,2004,39(6):33-40. 被引量：2677
3张维迎.(中国)政府管制的特殊成因[N].21世纪经济报道,2003—09—21.
4.GEM(Global Entrepreneurship Monitor)2001年报告[EB].http://www.Gemconsortium.org.,.
5Kirzner. Competition & Entrepreneurship [ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
6D. A. Harper. Institutional Conditions for Entrepreneurship [ J ]. Advances in Austrian Economics, 1998, (5).
7Dwight R. Lee. The Seeds of Entrepreneurship[ J]. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 1991,7, ( 1 ).
8James Gwartney, Randall Holcombe, Robert Lawson. The Scope of Government and the Wealth of Nations [ J ]. Cato Journal, 1998,18, (2).
9Randall G. Holcombe. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth : Reply [ J ]. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1999,2, (2).
10Steven Kreft, S. Sobel Russell. Public Policy, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth, 2004 [ Z ]. Working Paper.

二级参考文献29

1Barney, J B (1986). Strategic factor markets:Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Scince, 42, 1231-1241.
2Barney, J B (1995). Looking inside for competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive,9,49-61.
3Baron, R (1998)Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship:Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 275-294.
4Coase,, R H (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica. 4, 386-405.
5Cohen, W M , &Levinthal, D A (1990). Absorptive capacity: Anew perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Qurterly, 35, 128-152.
6Conner, K R , &Prahalad, C K (1996). Aresource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
7Hayek, F V (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519-530.
8Itami, H (1987). Moblization inviable assets. Cambridge Harvard University Press.
9Kirzner, I (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian Approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 60-85.
10Kirzner, I (1979). Perception, opportunity, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.