摘要
对于提单首要条款的性质,我国学界存在着截然不同的两种观点:一种观点认为提单首要条款是法律适用条款;另一种观点认为提单首要条款不是法律适用条款。本文针对第二种观点进行了深入分析,指出第二种观点是建立在传统国际私法理论基础之上的,随着国际私法传统理论的转型,第二种观点存在的理由和依据已经丧失。
There are two different opinions about the nature of the paramount clause of bill of lading.One opinion is that the paramount clause of bill of lading is a law applicable clause;the other is that the paramount clause is not a law applicable clause.The article profoundly analyzes the second opinion,and indicates that the second opinion is based on the traditional theory of private international law and its reason and foundation has disappeared with the transition of the traditional theory.
出处
《行政与法》
2005年第4期110-112,共3页
Administration and Law
