期刊文献+

皮亚杰晚年的“新理论”及其思考 被引量:17

Preliminary Research on Piaget’s New Theory in His Later Years
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 皮亚杰的经典认知发展理论堪称典范,但也并非尽如人意,以致20 世纪60、70 年代其理论经常遭受抨击。文章以对皮亚杰经典理论的批评和质疑为起点,重点介绍皮亚杰在生命的最后阶段所进行的理论建设,并试图对皮亚杰的新理论做出初步评价。作者认为,皮亚杰晚年的新理论建立在对应性、态射、范畴、转换等新的概念体系之上,并将发展视为从心理内态射到心理间态射,再到超态射的演变过程。由此,新理论强调了“水平”概念和“意义逻辑”,弱化了早期的“阶段”概念和“命题逻辑”。 Piaget’s classical theory of cognitive development, though considered classic, was not completely satisfactory and so it was criticized frequently in the 1960s and 1970s. This article began with the introduction of the reasons why it was criticized and challenged, followed by the theory reconstruction effort in Piaget’s later years and then the author tried to give preliminary evaluation on Piaget’s new theory. Author pointed out Piaget’s new theory based on these new concepts of correspondence, morphism, category and transform. Moreover, it regard development as a evolvement process from intramorphism to intermorphism to transmorphism. Therefore, Piaget’s new theory emphasized the concept of level and meaning logic, weakened the concept of stage and proposition logic.
作者 蒋京川
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第3期366-371,共6页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 经典认知发展理论 皮亚杰新理论 对应性 态射 范畴 Piaget’s classical theory of cognitive development, Piaget’s new theory, correspondence, morphisms, category
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Wason P C, Johnson-Laird P N. Psychology of reasoning:Structure and content. London: Batsford, 1972. 156.
  • 2McGarrigle J, Donaldson M. Conservation accidents.Cognition, 1975, 3:341-350.
  • 3Elliot A, Donaldson M. Piaget on language. In: S Modgill, CModgill (Eds). Jean Piaget: Consensus and Controversy.London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1982. 165.
  • 4Chapman M. Constructive evolution: Origins and development of Piaget's thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 131.
  • 5Acredolo C. Understanding Piaget's new theory. Human Development, 1997, 40:235.
  • 6卢盛华.皮亚杰的方法论:体系、优势与启示[J].心理学探新,2001,21(4):3-6. 被引量:4
  • 7Piaget J, Henriques G, Ascher E. Morphisms and categories:Comparing and transforming. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum, 1992.159-161.
  • 8Barrouillet E Poirier L. Comparing and transforming: An application of Piaget's morphisms theory to the development of class inclusion and arithmetic problem solving. Human Development, 1997, 40:230.
  • 9Richardson K. Models of cognitive development. Psychology Press Ltd, 1998. 137.
  • 10Bickhard M H. Piaget and active cognition. Human Development, 1997, 40:238-244.

二级参考文献8

  • 1林夏水.实践检验的两种功能──从现代数学的观点看[J].哲学研究,1994(1):21-28. 被引量:2
  • 2D.Bjorklund.Children's Thinking:Developmental Function and Individual Differences[M].Brooks/Cole Publishing Company,1995.130-156.
  • 3K.Fischer, T.Bidell.Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought[A].In W.Damon(ed).Handbook of Child Psychology: Introduction[C].NY: John Wiley & Sons,Inc,1998.467-562.
  • 4A.Demetriou, M.Shayer, A.Efklides.Neo-piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development[M].London:Routledge,1992.11-30,52-64.
  • 5R.Case.The development of conceptual structures[A].In D.Kuhn, R.Siegler(eds), Handbook of Child Psychology: Cognition,Perception,and Language[Z].NY:John Wiley & Sons,Inc,1998.745-800.
  • 6R.Case.The Mind's Staircase[M].NY:Erlbaum,1992.3-40.
  • 7A.卡米洛夫-史密斯.超越模块:认知科学的发展观[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001.1-27,160-177.
  • 8J.Flavell, P.Miller.S.Miller.Cognitive Development[M].Prentice-Hall Inc,1993.11-17.

共引文献14

同被引文献174

引证文献17

二级引证文献200

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部