摘要
本文指出,马克思笔下的由粗放经营向集约经营的转化,彭慕兰所阐述的18世纪之后西欧与东亚经济发展的大相径庭,以及迈克尔·波特所讲的一些自然资源短缺的国家,反倒在更高的层次上经济发展良好的事实,都是因为在资源逼迫之下选择了具有创新功能的、高技术含量的经济增长模式。文章强调,具有创新功能的、高技术含量的经济增长模式的选择,除了资源逼迫之外,还必须具有能够激励创新的制度安排,并为此进行了历史上西欧和东亚的对照分析。论文所阐述的观点对我国当代经济发展极具现实意义:我国经济发达地区,不应当陶醉于传统的比较优势,而应当适时地提升经济增长模式,增强国际竞争力。论文还探讨了在我国适时提升经济增长模式的制度安排及与此相关的改革。
The article points out that some countries can still develop well in a more higher level, even the following things exist, such as, the changing from extensive management to intensive management as Marx has said, the widely divergent of economic development between the West Europe and the East Asia after 18 century, and the shortage of some kind of the natural resources, because they chose the high-tech and innovative economic growth model under the pressure of the resource shortage. The article contrasts the economy growth models of West Europe and the East Asia in past and emphasize that the choice of economy growth model should be took in some institutional arrangement that can prompt the innovation. The viewpoints of the article have a practical meaning for Chinese economic development. The writer thinks that the Chinese developed regions should upgrade their economic growth model and boost up their international competitive ability in time and can not inebriate in their comparative advantages. The article also gives some suggestions for the relative institution reform.
出处
《中国工业经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第6期31-37,共7页
China Industrial Economics
关键词
资源逼迫
经济增长模式
技术创新
制度激励
resource pressure
economic growth model
technical innovation
institutional incentive
