期刊文献+

细粒棘球蚴感染小鼠T淋巴细胞亚群的变化及意义 被引量:16

Changes in T-cell subpopulation in kunming miceinfected with Echinococcus granulosus
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨细粒棘球蚴病宿主体内T淋巴细胞亚群在免疫调节和发病中的作用。方法:对感染细粒棘球蚴的昆明种小鼠观察20周,在不同时间取脾制备细胞悬液,用流式细胞术(FCM)检测CD4+、CD8+淋巴细胞的百分率。结果:细粒棘球蚴感染后的小鼠,于2周时CD4+、CD8+淋巴细胞的百分率明显增高(P<0.01),随后CD4+的百分率逐渐降低,CD8+的百分率逐渐增高,至感染16周后,CD4+的百分率较正常对照组下降(P<0.01),CD8+的百分率较正常对照组升高(P<0.01),CD4+/CD8+比值降低(P<0.01)。结论:感染细粒棘球蚴的小鼠早期以CD4+细胞反应为主,具有保护性免疫,感染后期逐渐以CD8+细胞为主,使机体呈免疫抑制状态,有利于细粒棘球蚴增殖。 Objective: To explore the immunological regulation mechanism of mice infected with Echinococcus granulosus. Methods: The course of the infection was observed for 20 weeks. Spleen cells from mice infected with Echinococcus granulosus were collected in different period, CD4+ and CD8+ cell levels were determined by flow cytometre. Result: Two weeks after infection,the CD4+ and CD8+ cell levels showed a significant increase(P<0.01), then CD4+ cell decreased and CD8+ cell increased gradually. Since 16 weeks after infection,the percentage of CD4+ cell were higher than that of control group(P<0.01)and the percentage of CD8+ cell were lower than that of control group(P<0.01). There was a significant drop down of CD4+ CD8+ ratio since 16 weeks after infection(P<0.01). Conclusion: CD4+ cell is mainly response in the early stage of infection, CD4+ response is replaced by CD8+ response in later period of infection. CE host exhibits an immune inhibition response,which is very useful to hosts with Echinococcus granulosus infection.
出处 《新疆医科大学学报》 CAS 2005年第5期402-404,共3页 Journal of Xinjiang Medical University
关键词 细粒棘球蚴 CD4^+淋巴细胞 CD8^+淋巴细胞 流式细胞术 Echinococcus granulosus CD4+ cell CD8+ cell flow cytometry(FCM)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1朱炳法.抑制T细胞与免疫[J].国外医学:免疫学分册,1981,492:73-78.
  • 2Gottsrein B, Mesarina B, Tanner I, et al. Speccific cellular and humoral immune responses in patients with different long-term courses of alveolar echinococcosi(infection with Echinococcus multilocularis)[J]. Am J Trop Med,1991,45(6):734.
  • 3Janssen D, Rueda MC, De Rycke PH, et al. Immunomodulation by hydatid cyst fluid toxin(Echinococcus granulosus)[J]. Parasite Immunol,1997,19(4):149.
  • 4雷松,魏于全.流式细胞术的基本原理[J].华西医学,1996,11(4):433-435. 被引量:16
  • 5郑宏,徐志新,汪师贞,温浩.宿主感染细粒棘球蚴免疫反应的研究进展[J].中国寄生虫病防治杂志,2002,15(1):55-58. 被引量:13
  • 6Macintyre AR, Dixon JB, Green JR. Mitosis and differentiation in T-cells under cytotoxic action of Echinococcus granulosus hydatid fluid[J]. Vet Parasitol,2001,96(4):277.
  • 7Bonder B, Auer H, Schilcher F, et al. Experimental investigations on the B and T cell immune response in primary alveolar echinococcoses[J]. Parasite Immunol,1999,21((8):409.
  • 8Rueda MC, Osuna A, DeRycke PH, et al. Changes in T-cell subpopulations in mice during prolonged experimental secondary infection with Echinococcus granulosus[J]. Biosci Rep,1995,15(4):201.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Heath DD, Lawrence SB. Antigenic polypeptides of Echinococcus granulosus oncosphers and definition of protective molecules[J].Parasite Immenol, 1996, 18: 347-357.
  • 2Gemmell MA, Lawson TK, Roberts MG. Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticercosis. Evaluation of the biological parameters of Taenia hydatigera and T.ovisand comparison with those of Echinococcus granulosus[J]. Parasitology, 1987, 94: 161-180.
  • 3Craig PS. Immunodiagrosis of Echinococus granulosus[M]. In:Andersen FL(Ed.).Compendium on Cystic Echirococcosis with Special Reference to the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, The People's Republic of China. Brigham Young University, Provo,UT-PP,1993.85-118.
  • 4Williams JF. Recent advances in the immunology of cestode infection[J]. J Parasitol, 1979, 65: 337-349.
  • 5Yong WK, Heath DD, Van Knapon F. Comparison of cestode antigens in an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Echinococcus granulosus, Taenia hydatigena and T.ovis infections in sheep[J]. Res Vet Sci, 1984, 36: 24-31.
  • 6Rogan MT, Marshall I , Reid GDF, et al. The potential use of Verret monkeys and baboons as models for the study of the immunology of Echinococcus granulosus infections[J]. Parasitology , 1993, 106: 115-123.
  • 7Meeusen E, Barcham GT, Gorrell MD, et al. Cysticercosis cellular immure responses during primary and secondary infection[J].Parasite Immuerol, 1990, 12: 403-418.
  • 8Rogan MT, Craig PS, Zeykle E, et al. In vitro of Taeniid oncospheres mediated by sera from hydatid endemic regions[J].Acta Trop, 1992,51: 291-296.
  • 9Dixon TB, Tenkins PB. Immunology of mammalian metacestode infections.ⅡImmunologcal recognition and effector function[J]. Helminthol Abs, 1995, 64: 599-613.
  • 10Dixon TB, Tenkins P. Immunology of mammalian metacestode infections.Ⅰ Antigens, protective immunity and immunopathology[J]. Helminthol Abs, 1995, 64: 533-542.

共引文献32

同被引文献129

引证文献16

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部