摘要
目的观察、比较科雷氏骨折3种外固定方法的利弊。方法将在门诊治疗的157例患者,按外固定方法的不同自然分为3组,即石膏组、小夹板组、纸夹板组。观察每组完全消肿的时间、骨折再移位和张力性水疱的发生率以及达到临床愈合所需的时间。结果石膏组消肿快、发生再移位和水疱者少见、愈合时间短、分别与另外两组比较,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论石膏固定仍是科雷氏骨折最可靠的外固定法。
Objective To observe and comparare the advantage and disadvantage of three types of external immobilization for treatment of Colle's fracture. Methods In this study 157 outpaitents of Colle's fracture were divided into three groups randomly as plaster cast wood splint and card board splint group. For each group the duration of swelling the occurrence rate of redisplacement of fracture and develping of tensive bleb and the time needed for fracture healing were observed and compared. Results In the plaster cast group it was observed that the subsidence of swelling occurred most early the redisplacement of fracture and tensive bleb developing were not common and the fracture healing needed less time. Compared with the other two groups respectively there was a significantly statistic difference P<0.05. Conclusions Plaster cast is a more reliable external immobilization for the fracture of Colle's.
出处
《海南医学》
CAS
2005年第6期32-33,共2页
Hainan Medical Journal
关键词
科雷氏骨折
石膏
小夹板
纸夹板
固定
Colle's fracture Plaster cast Wood splint card board splint immobilization
