期刊文献+

现代我国体育课程与体育教学的分离与整合研究 被引量:13

Research on Separation and Integration of Modern PE Curriculum and PE Teaching in China
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用文献资料法、逻辑法和比较法等研究方法,对现代体育课程与体育教学分离的原因和结果及整合的理念与途径作出了初步探讨。结论:“制度课程”与“二元论”是造成体育课程与体育教学分离的根源;体育课程与体育教学的分离不利于两者的横向融合和体育课程的创生;“体育课程教学”,即体育课程与体育教学过程的本质是变革、体育教学在本质上是一种体育课程开发过程、体育课程在本质上是一种体育教学事件,是促进体育课程与体育教学整合的新理念;理清体育课程与体育教学的关系、促进体育课程论专家与体育教学论专家的平等对话、赋予体育教师和学生对体育课程的话语权,是推动体育课程与体育教学整合的有效途径。 In order to promote the revolution of PE curriculum and PE teaching, by using literature, logic and comparative method, this paper mainly discussed the causes and results of separation as well as the ideas and ways of integration about modern physical education curriculum and physical education teaching. The authors thought that 'institutional curriculum' and 'dualism' are the roots which result in the separation of physical education curriculum and physical education teaching; the separation of the curriculum and teaching doesn't fit to their combination and creation; physical education teaching is essentially a kind of development process of physical education curriculum. This is a new idea to promote the integration of physical education curriculum and physical education teaching. And there are some effective ways, such as clearing the relation between physical education curriculum and physical education teaching, accelerating the equal dialogue between the experts in the two fields, entrusting the rights to words to both physical education teacher and students, to promote the integration of physical education curriculum and physical education teaching.
出处 《天津体育学院学报》 CAS CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第4期11-13,共3页 Journal of Tianjin University of Sport
基金 全国教育科学"十五"规划教育部重点课题(项目编号:DLA010366)
关键词 体育课程 体育教学 制度课程 二元论 physical education curriculum physical education teaching institutional curriculum dualism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Tanner D, Tanner L N Curriculum Development: Theory into Practice [M]. New York: Macmillan, 1980: 3-4.
  • 2See Doyle W. Curriculum and Pedagogy, in Handbook of Research on Curriculum[M]. New York: Macmillan, 1992:487-488.
  • 3Broudy H S, B O, Burnett J R. Democracy and Excellence in American Secondary Education[M]. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964 : 69-70.
  • 4Inlow G M. The Emergent in Curriculum, 2nd ed[M]. New York: Wiley,1973:41-42.
  • 5Johnson M Jr. Definition and Models in Curriculum Theory[J]. Educational Theory, 1967,(17): 129-130.
  • 6Taba H. Curriculum Development[M]. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World,1962:213-214.
  • 7Oliva P F. Developing the Curriculum[M]. Brown Company, 1982: 5-6.
  • 8Lyotard J. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge[M]. University of Minnesota Press, 1984: 23-24.
  • 9王策三.教学论稿[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1985,6..
  • 10陈侠.课程论的学科位置和它同教学论的关系[J].课程.教材.教法,1987,7(3):24-27. 被引量:15

共引文献118

同被引文献162

引证文献13

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部