期刊文献+

焊缝非匹配海底管线缺陷在不同标准下的安全评定研究 被引量:3

Safe Assessment of Offshore Pipeline under Weld Mismatched Condition Based on Different Standards
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究在给定裂纹尺寸和载荷条件下,根据CTOD(裂纹尖端张开位移)试验结果,先后采用英国标准协会提出的BS7910标准和欧共体提出的结构完整性评定方法SINTAP,针对EH36管线钢焊接接头焊趾处的表面裂纹进行评定。根据拉伸试验结果,建立了管线钢焊接接头的评定曲线。评定结果表明,应用BS7910标准进行评定时,各评定点不在评定曲线定义的范围内,说明该结构不能验收;而使用SINTAP方法评定,各评定点均在评定曲线定义的范围内,此时结构是可以接受的。本次研究充分说明SINTAP在强度不匹配方面要求更加详细,评定结果保守性相应地更低。 According to the CTOD (Crack Tip Opening Displacement) test result and using the BS7910 produced by the British Standards Institution and the SINTAP (Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure) sponsored by the European Commission, given crack size and load, the assessment was carried out on surface flaw at the toe of weld in EH36 pipeline. Based on the tensile test results of base metal and weld metal, the failure assessment diagram were created. The assessment results based on BS7910 indicate that all the assessment points are out of the regions defined on the failure assessment diagrams, so the structure is not safe.While the assessment results based on SINTAP illuminate that all the assessment points are within the regions defined on the failure assessment diagrams, so the structure can be accepted. The research also shows that SINTAP requires more detailed input information and leads to less conservative results in the mismatched structure.
出处 《压力容器》 北大核心 2005年第7期4-7,共4页 Pressure Vessel Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50375109) 中国海洋石油工程股份有限公司资助项目
关键词 BS7910 SINTAP 裂纹张开位移 强度不匹配因子 失效评定图 安全评定 <Keyword>guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures structural integrity assessment procedure crack tip opening displacement mismatched-strength factor failure assessment diagram safe assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1BS7910:1999(incorporating Amendment No.1) Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, British Standards Institution[S]. London, 2000API.579, Recommended practice for fitness-for-service Washington.
  • 2SINTAP (Structural Integrity Assessment Procedures for European Industry)[S].Project No.BE95-1426, Final Procedure November 1999.
  • 3BS 7448(Part 2): Method for Determination of Critical CTOD and Critical J Values of Welds in Metallic Materials[S].1997.

同被引文献22

  • 1邓彩艳,张玉凤,霍立兴.冲击吸收功在海底油气管道安全评定中的应用[J].中国机械工程,2005,16(3):230-234. 被引量:2
  • 2张玉玲,王冒明,吴新如,孙振华,陶晓燕.铁路桥梁钢及焊缝的CTOD性能[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(5):585-588. 被引量:10
  • 3谭开忍,肖熙.基于全生命周期的海底管线缺陷评估的研究[J].中国海洋平台,2005,20(6):27-29. 被引量:2
  • 4BS 7448 - 1997, Fracture mechanics toughness tests. Part 2. Method for determination of KIC, critical CTOD and critical J value of welds in metallic material[S]. .
  • 5BS7910-1999,金属结构中缺陷验收评定方法导则[S].
  • 6API 1104 - 1996, Welding of Pipeline and Related Facilities[S].
  • 7DNV - OS - 401 - 2001, Fabrication and testing of offshore structure [S].
  • 8Jijin Xu, Ligong Chen, Chunzhen Ni. A study on the mechanical stress relieving and safety assessment without post - weld heat treatment[M]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2007, 443, 107-113.
  • 9邬佑靖.全焊接阀体管线球阀非热时效处理.world valve,2006,(8):37-41.
  • 10API 6D - 1992, Specification for pipeline valves ( Gate, Plug, Ball and Check valves)[S].

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部