期刊文献+

官僚行为研究模式——比较与发展

Models of research on bureaucratic behavior -comparison and development
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探索了官僚行为研究的基本途径,梳理了四个官僚行为研究流派的特性,力图厘清这些流派所赖以存在的基本价值前提,并建议在官僚行为研究中运用综合模式。该模式应涵盖不同流派所针对的各自不同的官僚行为动机,它将比其它流派更全面地解释公共官僚的行为动机,并将增进我们对官僚的基本行为动机、公共利益和组织绩效之间关系的理解。 Although there are quite a few streams of research on bureaucratic behavior, each goes its own way; furthermore, the main findings of each research do not provide satisfactory interpretations of bureaucratic behavior, and do not reflect complexity of human behavior. This article explores the basic approaches towards bureaucratic behavior, examining the characteristics of the four existing schools of bureaucratic behavior research and presenting the underlying assumptions of them. It also suggests building a composite model of research on bureaucratic behavior, which should accommodate the different motives that different schools have dealt with, provide a more comprehensive interpretation on bureaucratic behavior, and advance more of our understanding of the relations among the basic motives of bureaucrats, public interest,and organization performance.
作者 辛传海
出处 《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第8期93-98,共6页 Chinese Public Administration
关键词 官僚 动机 行为 流派 模式 bureaucrat motive behavior school model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Johan P. Olsen. Gaus Award Lecture 2003: Citizens, Public Administration and the Search for Foundations [ J ]. Political Science, 2004. 37 ( 1 ) : 69 - 79.
  • 2Robert Behn. The Big Questions of Public Management [ J ]. Public Administration Review . 1995. 55 C4) : 313 -24.
  • 3(美)拉尔夫·P 哈莫.官僚经验:对现代组织方式之批评[M].台北:五南图书出版社,1997..
  • 4Lois R. Wise. Bureaucratic Posture: On the Need for a Composite Theory of Bureaucratic Behavior[J]. Public Administration Review. 2004. 64(6) :669 - 81.
  • 5James G. March, Johan P. Olsen. Rediscovering Institutions[M]. Toronto: Free Press. 1989.
  • 6Jarle Trondal, Frode Veggeland. Access, Voice, Loyalty : The Representation of Domestic Civil Servants in EU Committees[J]. Journal of European Public Policy. 2003. 10(1) : 59-77.
  • 7Peter Ehn, Magnus Isberg, Claes Linde and Gunnar Wallin. Swedish Bureaucracy in an Era of Change [ J ]. Governance. 2003.16 (3) : 429 - 58.
  • 8Hal G. Rainey, P. Steinbauer. Galloping Elephants : Developing Elements of a Theory of Elective Government Organisations[J]. Journal of Public Administration Reseach and Theory. 1999. 9 (1) : 1 -31.
  • 9David H. Rosenbloom. Forms of Bureaucratic Representation in the Federal Service[J]. Midwest Review of Public Administration. 1994. 8(3): 159-77.
  • 10Charles H. Lindblom. The Science of Muddling Through[C]. In Public Administration Concepts and Cases, 7th ed. ,edited by Richard Stillman, 225 -36. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 2000.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部