期刊文献+

企业集团的理论综述与探讨 被引量:42

The Discussion of Three Interpretations on Business Group
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文回顾了在企业集团研究中占主导地位的三种理论框架,即经济学(以制度经济学和资源理论为主)、社会学和政治学理论。这些理论从外部市场失效或者市场机制不完全、集团以内部市场替代外部市场并以较低的交易费用使成员企业获得产品或者要素资源、社会关系、传统以及社会规范对组织行为和结构的影响、国家和政府与企业集团的关系,以及双方之间的相互影响等角度出发,对企业集团的起因、角色和组织形式做出解释。在上述三种理论的指导下,相应的实证研究检验了企业集团内部市场的作用、资源分配体制、连锁董事以及政府政策对集团多元化战略和组织结构的影响,并取得了初步成果,本文也对今后企业集团研究的方向提出了建议。 This article reviews three dominant theories in study of business groups, including economic theory (particularly institutional economics and resource-based theory), sociology theories, and politics theories. These theories explained the foundation and development of business groups, the role of business groups and their organizational arrangements, from perspectives of imperfect external market or market absence, internal markets within business groups as the substitute, which enables member firms to exchange commodities and/or resources with lower transaction costs, influence of socialrel ations, traditions and social norms on organizational behavior and structure, and the relationship between national governments and enterprises as well as their interactions. Under the guidelines of the above three theories, respective empirical studies examined the function of internal markets within groups, resource allocation mechanisms, interlocking directorates and influences of governmental policies on group diversification and structure. These studies have made primary achievement. The article proposes future directions for study of business groups.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2005年第4期28-35,43,共9页 Nankai Business Review
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重点项目资助 编号04JZD0018
关键词 企业集团 经济学解释 社会学解释 政治学解释 理论综述 制度经济学 资源理论 内部市场 组织结构 政府政策 Business Groups Economical Explanations Sociological Explanations Political Explanations
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Strachan, H. Family and other Business Groups in Economic Development. New York: Praeger, 1976.
  • 2Leff, N. H. Industrial Organization and Entrepreneurship in the Developing Countries: The Economic Groups. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1978, (78): 661-674.
  • 3Encarbatuibm, D. Dislodging Multinationals: India's Comparative Perspectives. New York: Cornell University Press, 1989.
  • 4Granovetter, M. Business groups. N. Smelser, R. Swedberg(editors). Handbook of Economic Sociology, 1994, 453-475.
  • 5Khanna, T, Rivkin, J. W. Estimating the Performance Effects of Business Groups in Emerging Markets. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(1): 45-74.
  • 6Chang, S-J., Choi, U. Strategy, Structure, and Performance of Korean Business Groups: A Transactions Cost Approach. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1988, 37(2): 141-159.
  • 7国家统计局.2001年中国大企业集团[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2002..
  • 8Nolan, P. China and the Global Business Revolution. Hampshire:Palgrave. 2001.
  • 9Goto, A. Business Groups in a Market Economy. European Economic Review, 1982, (19): 53-70.
  • 10Orr u, M., Biggart, N. W., Hamilton, Gary G. Organizational Isomorphism in East Asia. W. W. Powell, P. J. DiMaggio (editors).The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991, 361-389.

共引文献1

同被引文献657

引证文献42

二级引证文献285

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部