期刊文献+

躯干肌慢速等速向心收缩肌力的测试研究 被引量:10

A study on low speed isokinetic concentric contraction testing of trunk muscle strength
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究不同速度对躯干肌慢速等速肌力测试的影响,探讨用于躯干肌肌力评定的慢速等速肌力测试合理的速度参数。方法:健康受试者43例,使用美国产BiodexⅡAP型多关节等速测试系统测定躯干肌峰力矩(PT)、相对峰力矩(PT/BW)、总功(TW)、相对总功(TW/BW)和屈伸比值(F/E),测试角速度分别选用30°/s和60°/s。结果:伸展收缩测试时两组间的PT、PT/BW、TW和TW/BW比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05),屈曲收缩测试时上述指标比较差异无显著性意义(P>0.05),两组间F/E差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:躯干肌慢速等速测试中,速度明显影响伸展测试值,30°/s比60°/s等速测试似更能反映躯干肌的力学特征,而对屈曲测试值的影响并不明显,在慢速范围内,屈肌肌力测试值似处于稳定的峰值状态。 Objective: To investigate the influence of velocity on low speed isokinetic concentric contraction testing of trunk muscle strength and find the best velocity.Method:43 volunteers were tested by Biodex Ⅱ^AP Mulit-joint System,testing velocity was 30°/s and 60°/s. Paired sample t test was used to analyse their peak torque (PT),peak torque to body weight(PT/BW),total work(TW),total work to body weight(TW/BW) and flexion to extension(F/E) with SPSS11.0.Resuit: PT, PT/BW,TW,and TW/BW of extension had significant difference between the two groups (P〈 0.05), but no significant difference between the two groups in their flexion testing(P〉0.05),the F/E ratio was significant difference hetween the two groups (P〈0.05).Conclusion:Velocity is the most important factor during low speed isokinetic concentric extension contraction testing of trunk muscle strength,but it has no influence on flexion testing, the F/E ratio is significant different in 30°/s and 60°/s testing.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第8期589-591,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 躯干肌 等速测试 肌力测试 速度 trunk muscle isokinetic testing muscle strength testing velocity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献32

  • 1成鹏.青年男性膝关节等速向心收缩正常值研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,1996,15(1):50-51. 被引量:41
  • 2杨克勤.脊柱疾病的临床与研究[M].北京:北京出版社,1993.22-23.
  • 3刘世杰.实用外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1992.2114-2117.
  • 4Shirado O,Ito T,Kaneda K,et al.Concentric and eccentric strength of trunk muscle:influence of test postures on strength and characteristics of patients with chronic low-back pain.Arch Phys Med Rehabil,1995,76:604-611.
  • 5Suzuki N,Endo S.A quantitative study of trunk muscle strength and fatigability in low-back pain syndrome.Spine,1983,8:69.
  • 6Hembog B.Moritz U.Intra-abdomical pressure and trunk muscle aetivity during lifing Ⅱ.Chronic low-back patients.Scand J Rehabil Med.1985.17:6.
  • 7Nicholaisen T, Jorgensen R. Trunk strength, back muscle endurance and low-back trouble. Scand J Rebabil Med, 1985,17:122.
  • 8Sirca A, Kosteve V. The fibre type composition of thoracic and lumbar paravertebral muscles in man. J Anat,1985,141:131-137.
  • 9国家中医药管理局.中华人民共和国中药行业标准--中医病症诊断疗效标准.南京:南京大学出版社,1994.201-202
  • 10Schnebel B E, Simmons J W, Chowing J et al. A digitiz-ing technique for the study of movement of intradiscaldye in response to flexion and extension of the lumbarspine. Spine, 1988, 13 (3): 309

共引文献201

同被引文献85

引证文献10

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部