期刊文献+

肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床分析及手术技巧 被引量:40

Clinical analysis and operation skills of locking proximal humeral plate in treating proximal humeral fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的总结和评价应用肱骨近端锁定接骨板(locking proximal humeral plate,LPHP)治疗肱骨近端骨折的初步临床疗效和手术技巧.方法 2002年12月至2005年1月,应用AO/ASIF的LPHP治疗132例肱骨近端骨折患者,其中男性57例,女性75例;年龄18~79岁,平均58.7岁.根据Neer分类:二部分骨折74例,三部分骨折47例,四部分骨折11例.结果 132例患者随访时间为3~28个月,平均15.6个月.均达到骨性愈合,平均愈合时间为9.2周.根据Neer评分,优良率为82.31%.有2例患者LPHP固定失败.结论 LPHP具有固定稳定,血运破坏少等优点,在正确掌握手术技巧的前提下,是治疗肱骨近端骨折的较好方法. Objective To summarize the surgical techniques and evaluate the preliminary results of locking proximal humeral plate (LPHP) in treating proximal humeral fractures. Methods From December 2002 to January 2005, 132 cases of proximal humeral fractures were treated using LPHP manufactured by AO/ ASIF. There were 57 males and 75 females. The ages of this group ranged from 18 to 79 years old, with an average of 58.7 years. According to Neer classification, there were 74 cases of two-part fractures, 47 cases of three-part fractures, and 11 cases of fourpart fractures. Results The follow-up period of the 132 cases ranged from 3 months to 28 months, the average being 15.6 months. LPHP fixation failed in 2 cases. Bone union was achieved in all the rest cases, with the mean healing period of 9.2 months. According to Neer scoring, the excellent and good result rate was 82.31%. Conclusion LPHP possesses such advantages as stable fixation of the fracture and less disturbance of the blood supply. It is an effective method to treat proximal humeral fractures if the proper operation skills are excuted.
出处 《中华手外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2005年第5期262-264,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery
关键词 肱骨骨折 骨折固定术 骨折愈合 肱骨近端锁定接骨板 肱骨近端骨折 HP治疗 手术技巧 接骨板 临床分析 平均愈合时间 Humeral fractures Fracture fixation, internal Fracture healing Locking proxinal humeral plate
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Lind T, Kroner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1989,108:285-287.
  • 2Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1970,52:1077-1089.
  • 3Szyszkowitz R, Seggl W, Schleifer P, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: Management techniques and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1993,292:13-25.
  • 4Choi CH, Cuomo F. Proximal humeral fractures. Current Opinion in Orthopedics,2000,11:256-263.
  • 5Elkowitz SJ, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Decision making for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery,2002,3:234-250.
  • 6Ruch DS, Glisson RR, Marr AW, et al. Fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma,2000,14:36-40.
  • 7Fankhauser F, Boldinc C, Schippinger G, et al. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2005,430:176-181.
  • 8Strohm PC, Kostler W, Sudkamp NP. Locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Techniques in Shoulder & Elbow Surgery,2005,6:8-13.
  • 9Lill H, Hepp P, Korner J, et al. Proximal humerus fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2003,123:74-81.
  • 10Lungershausen W, Bach O, Lorenz CO. Locking plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the proximal humerus. Zentralbl Chir,2003,128:28-33.

同被引文献299

引证文献40

二级引证文献284

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部