期刊文献+

脑卒中患者生存质量量表效度研究 被引量:15

Research on validity evaluation of Chinese version of Stroke Impact Scale
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验脑卒中患者生存质量疾病专表—脑卒中影响量表(SIS)应用于中国脑卒中患者的效度。方法:遵照SIS量表的发行机构MAPI推荐的程序及借鉴中山大学公共卫生学院统计学教研室译制经验编译SIS量表中文版,并使用此中文版对初次脑卒中发病后1个月的住院患者(180例)进行测量,运用相应的统计学方法进行效度分析。结果:SIS量表中文版的8个领域与FCA量表、SF-36量表的相关部分进行Pearson相关性分析,相关系数经统计学检验P<0.05。结构效度中各公因子所包括的条目基本与原量表相同。结论:中文版SIS量表具有良好的效度,适用于脑卒中患者生存质量的评测。 Objective: To evaluate the validity of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) as applied in Chinese population. Method: One hundred and eighty stroke survivors were involved in this study, ranging from 41 to 78 years. The linguistic validation process involved several major steps as MAPI recommended and consulting experience of Sun yat-sen University. The quality of life after stroke was evaluated by using the SIS Chinese version at 1 month and the validity was analyzes. Result:Each of the domain scales showed good criterion validity by Pearson analysis (P〈 0.05). Factor analysis showed that the construction of Chinese version was same as the English version when 5 factors were extracted. Conclusion:The Chinese version of Stroke Impact Scale, a stroke-specific outcome measure is a valid instrument for Chinese stroke survivors. It is optimistic about its usefulness in measuring quality of life in China.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第9期672-674,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 脑卒中 量表 生存质量 效度 stroke scale : quality of life validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Francis G, Dorcas B. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-relationed quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1993,46(12):1417-1432.
  • 2各类脑血管疾病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29(6):379-380. 被引量:33091
  • 3兰月,黄东锋,胡昔权,陈小妹.脑卒中患者生存质量量表的编译及使用研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(10):769-771. 被引量:40
  • 4Fallowfield L. The quality of life: the missing measurement in health care[M].London: Souenir Press,1990.
  • 5Hays RD, Anderson R, Revieki D. Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures[J].Quality of Life Research,1993,2(2):441-449.
  • 6Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, et al. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale [J].Stroke,1999,30(7):1362-1369.
  • 7Hamedani AG, Wells CK, Brass LM, et al, A quality-of-life instrument for young hemorrhagic stroke patients [J].Stroke,2001,32(3): 687-695.
  • 8Dorman P, Slattery J, Farrell B, et al. A randomized comparison of the EuroQOL and SF-36 after stroke[J].BMJ,1997,315:461.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Francis G, Dorcas B. Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelationed quality of life measures:literature review and proposed guidelines[J].J Clin Epidemiol,1993,46(12):1417-1432.
  • 2[3]Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM,et al.The stroke impact scale version 2.0.Evaluation of reliability,validity, and sensitivity to change[J].Stroke, 1999,30(10):2131 -2140.
  • 3[4]Buck D,Jacoby A,Massey A,et al. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke[J].Stroke, 2000,31(8): 2004-2010.
  • 4[5]Chwalow AJ. Cross-cultural validation of existing quality of life scales[J].Patient Educ Couns, 1995,26(1-3) :313-318.
  • 5[6]Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. The Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile:a review of adaptation and instrument characteristics[J].Qual Life Res,1994,3 (6) :385-393.
  • 6[7]Guyatt GH. The philosophy of health-related quality of life translation[J].Quality of Life Research, 1993,2(6) :461-465.

共引文献33119

同被引文献147

引证文献15

二级引证文献677

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部