专利竞争优势的理论探源被引量：40

Theoretical Perspectives on Patent Competitive Advantage

导出

摘要目前,专利问题不再仅仅是留给律师和工程师们的技术性工作,更应成为高层经理们制定战略时考虑的关键内容,但专利战略管理的理论研究还不够深入。本文认为垄断与创新,这个专利系统不得不面临的悖论难题却使专利竞争优势具有多种租金性质和存在一定的时空范围,也造就了专利竞争的立体性、多维性和复杂性。这不仅突出了开展专利战略管理研究的必要性和重要性,也为专利的差异化战略设计提供巨大空间和丰富的理论源泉。 At present,the patent issue is no longer only the technical work leaving lawyers and engineers,but should become the key content that managers on the senior level consider while making strategy. However,the theoretical research of patent strategy management is still quite preliminary. This paper argues that the monopolization and innovation which patent system has to face the paradox difficult problem makes the competition advantage of the patent hold the nature of many kinds of rent and space-time unique,and also has brought up the multi-dimension and complexity of patent competition. This has not merely stressed the necessity and importance to launch the study on the patent strategy management,and also offered enormous space and abundant theory source for the fact that patent difference strategy is designed.

作者刘林青谭力文

机构地区武汉大学企业战略管理研究所

出处《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第11期89-94,共6页 China Industrial Economics

基金国家社会科学基金项目"跨国公司制造业和服务业外包发展趋势与我国政策研究"(批准号04BJY003) 湖北省专利发展基金项目"半导体照明芯片制造技术的专利分析及专利战略研究"

关键词专利竞争优势专利战略管理专利组合 patent competitive advantage strategic management of patent patent portfolios

分类号 F271 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Denicolo,V. Patent Races and Optimal Patent Breadth and Length[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1996, (3).
2Gilbert,R.,Shapiro,C. Optimal Patent Length and Breadth[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, (1).
3Hall,B. H.,Ziedonis,R. M. The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2001, (1).
4Kitch,E. W. The Nature and Function of the Patent System[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1977.
5Langinier, C., Moschini,G. The Economies of Patents :An Overview[R]. Iowa State Univemity Working Paper,2002.
6Pitkethly,R. H. Intellectual Property Strategy in Japanese and UK Companies:Patent Licensing Decisions and Learning Opportunities[J]. Research Policy, 2001, (3).
7Reitzig,M. Strategic Management of Intellectual Property[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review,2004,(3).
8Scherer,F. M. Nordhaus'Theory of Optimal Patent Life: A Geometric Reinterpretation [J]. American Economic Review, 1972, (3).
9Shapiro,C. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses,Patent Pools,and Standard Setting [C]. In J. L. Adam Jaffee,and Scott Stern,ed. Innovation Policy and the Economy[C]. MIT Press. 2001.
10Somaya,D. Theoretical Perspectives on Patent Strategy[M]. University of Maryland,2002.

二级参考文献39

1Levin, R C, A K Klevoriek, R R Nelson, and S G Winter. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development[R]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987, (3):783-820.
2Kortum, S and J Lemer. Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting?[R]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1998,48: 247-304.
3Long C. Patent signals[J]. The University of Chicago Law Review, 2002,69:625-679.
4Cohen Met al. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U S manufacturing firms patent (or not) [DB]. NBER Working Papers, http://www, nber. org/papers/w7552, 2004/12/12.
5Griliehes Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey[J]. Journal of Economic Literature , 1990,28:1661-1662.
6Alchian A A and H Demsetz. Production, information costs, and economic organization[J]. American Economic Review,1972,62:777-780.
7F M Scherer. The innovation lottery[A]. Rochelle Dreyfuss et al. Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge soeiety[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press , 2001:3-11.
8Wagner P R and G Parehomovsky. Patent portfoliosl[DB]. SSRN Working Papers, http://ssrn, com/abstraet=582201,2004/12/12.
9IBronwyn H H and R H Ziedonis. The patent paradox revisited:an empirical study of patenting in the U S semiconductor industry, 1979-1995[J]. RAND Journal of Economies, 2001,32 : 101- 125.
10Merges, R P. Contracting into liability rules:intellectual property rights and collective rights organizations[J]. California Law Review, 1996, 84(5) : 1293-1393.