期刊文献+

政府有义务对义务教育资源进行均衡化 被引量:2

The Government Should Equal Compulsory Education Resources
原文传递
导出
摘要 介绍义务教育和均衡这两个名词的实质,揭示义务教育本身即要求均衡。根据投入与产出之间的关系,指出达到义务教育均衡的前提之一是义务教育资源的均衡化。从现代政府财政的职责、公共产品理论、人力资本理论等角度出发论述政府有义务对义务教育资源进行均衡化。简要介绍世界各国、各地区政府对义务教育资源进行均衡化的种种措施,并从效率的角度简略提出可能的反对意见。
作者 李锋亮
出处 《教育科学研究》 2005年第12期9-13,共5页 Educational Science Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Burke et al 2001 The Influence of District Characteristics on Intra-district Resource Allocations. Journal of Education Finance. 26:259-280
  • 2Hadderman M 1999 Equity and Adequacy in Educational Finance. ERIC Digest Number 129
  • 3Hartman W 1999 Education Funding Disparities: What Do the Dollars Buy? Journal of Education Finance. 24 (3):389-408
  • 4Odden A R, Lawrence O P 1992 School Finance: A Policy Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill
  • 5Psacharopoulos G 1985 Returns to education: A further international update and implications. The Journal of Human Resources. 20(4): 583-604
  • 6Psacharopoulos G 1989 Time Trends of the returns to education: Cross-national evidence. Economics of Education Review. 8(3): 225-239
  • 7Psacharopoulos G,Patrinos Harry A 2002 Returns to Investment in Education: a Further Update. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2881. World Bank
  • 8Stiefel L et al 1998 Intra-District Equity in Four Large Cities:Data,Methods, and Results. Journal of Education Finance.23(4): 447-67
  • 9[10][11]Carnoy M,1995,《教育生产(导言)》;Hanushek E A,1995,《教育生产函数》;Levin H M,1995,《提高教育生产率》,载《教育经济学国际百科全书(第二版)》,Carnoy M编著,闵维方等译,高等教育出版社,2000年版.
  • 10Rosen S,1987,《人力资本》,载《新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典》,Eatwell J等编,陈岱孙主编译,经济科学出版社,1992年版.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Odden,A. (2000). The new school finance:providing adequacy and improving equity[J]. Journal of Education Finance. 25 (Spring 2000), pp, 467-488.
  • 2Guthrie, J., and Rothstein, R. (1999). Enabling adequacy to achieve reality: Translating adequacy into state school finale distribution arrangements [M]. In Ladd, H. , et. al.(eds.) Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance. Washington,DC : National Academy Press, pp. 209- 259.
  • 3Reschovsky,A. and Imazeki, J. ( 1998 ). The development of school finance formulas to guarantee the provision of adequate education to low- income students [M]. In William J.Fowler, Jr. (ed.) Developments in School Finance 1997. Fiscal Proceedings from the Annual State Data Conference July 1997.U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. NCES pp. 98-212.
  • 4Goertz, M. and Edwards, M. (1999). In search of excellence for all: The courts and New Jersey, school finance reform[J]. Journal of Education Finance. 25, pp. 5-32.
  • 5Goertz,R. K, Goertz, M. E. New Jersey school finale 1998 [M]. In Tetreault, D.R. (ed.) The States of the States and provinces 1998. Proceedings of the 1998 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego,California, April 1998.
  • 6Guthrie, J., and Rothstein, R. (1999). Enabling adequacy to achieve reality: Translating adequacy into state school finance distribution arrangements [M]. In Ladd, H. , et. al.(eds.) Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance, Washington,DC:National Academy Press, pp. 209-259.
  • 7New Jersey Department of Education. ( 1996 ).Comprehensive Plan for Educational Improvement and Financing[R]. Trenton, N. J. L N.J. Department of Education.
  • 8Odden, A. , and Picus, L. (2000). School finance:A policy perspective[M].2nd edition, McGraw Hill, pp. 156-196.
  • 9北京大学课题组,“中国贫困地区义务教育财政”十案调查报告(未发表)[R].2001—10.

共引文献87

同被引文献50

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部