期刊文献+

中美煤矿安全比较与借鉴 被引量:22

Comparison of Coal Mine Safety between China and the US
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国和美国都是煤炭生产和消费大国,但是中国的煤矿安全却与美国存在巨大差距。笔者首先从两国历年来煤矿安全数据分析入手,认为:美国煤矿安全经历了严重恶化、小幅波动和安全稳定3个阶段;而中国的煤矿经历了改革开放前大起大落和其后的小幅波动两个阶段,迄今为止,还没有进入安全稳定时期。然后从法规、监察、采矿权、安全投入、矿工及工会、教育及培训、科技进步等7个方面对两国的煤矿安全进行了比较。最后,借鉴美国进入第3阶段的成功经验,提出一些改善中国煤矿安全的相应对策建议,如完善法规、加强监管、明晰采矿权、设立安全投入预算资金、改善矿工的弱势地位、加强教育与培训、依靠科技进步等。 China and the US both are big country of coal production and consumption, but as for coal safety, China lags far behind the US. After reviewing and analyzing the safety data in coal mines of both countries, it is considered that the US histcory of cord mine safety has undergone three periods i. e. serious worsening, moderate fluctuation and steady safety. However, coal mines in China have only undergone through two periods i.e. vigorous fluctuation before refotm and opening, followed by moderate fluctuation periot; up to now still have not entered into steady period. Following aspects of coal mine safety between two countries are compared including legislation, safety inspection, mining authonization, safety inpust, miners and trade union, education and training, technolngical advancement. Referring to the successful expexience in the US relevant countermeasures for improving the coal mine safety in China are suggested such as to perfect relevant legislation, to strengthen safety inspection, to clarify mining authofization, to set budget of safety input, to improve the disadvantageous status of miners, to reinforce safety education and training, to promote the reliability on science and technology.
作者 李艳梅 张雷
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 2005年第11期44-48,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(90210037)
关键词 煤矿安全 中美比较 启示 结论 coal mine safety comparison between China and the US inspiradcn conclusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献8

  • 1孙笑侠.论法律对行政的综合化控制——从传统法治理论到当代行政法的理论基础[J].比较法研究,1999,13(Z1):378-391. 被引量:39
  • 2应松年.走向行政法治[J].行政法学研究,1998(4):6-7. 被引量:1
  • 3The costs to Britian of workplace accidents and work-related ill health in 1995/1996[M].HSE Books, 1999
  • 4Marin, Alan, and George Psacharopoulos. The Reward for Risk in the Labor Market: Evidence from the United Kingdom and a Reconciliation with Others Studies[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1982,90(4): 827-853
  • 5Viscusi, W. Kip, Wesley A. Magat, and Joel Huber. Pricing Health Risks: Survey Assessment of Risk-Risk and Risk-Dollar Tradeoffs[J],Journal of Enviorment Economics and Management,1991,21(1), 32-51
  • 6A迈里克 弗里曼著 曾贤刚译.环境与资源价值评估--理论与方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002..
  • 7世界银行.碧水蓝天--展望21世纪的中国环境[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1997..
  • 8黄燕娣.国内外事故——经济损失评估理论与方法[J].安全,2003,24(1):6-7. 被引量:14

共引文献31

同被引文献110

引证文献22

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部