期刊文献+

噪声暴露不同时程中大鼠ABR及DPOAE的变化 被引量:6

Effects of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in rats
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究在长期间断性噪声暴露的不同时程中大鼠听觉脑干诱发电位(ABR)和畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)的变化特点,寻找导致暂时性阈移的最小暴露时间以及长期噪声暴露过程中的敏感客观评价指标。方法:将42只成年Wistar大鼠随机分为7组,分别暴露于115 dB SPL宽带噪声下3、6、9、12、15和21 d (给声12 h/停声12 h),噪声停止后24 h和6周分别测定ABR和DPOAE,同时与对照组进行比较分析。结果: 所有的暴露组中,ABR的阈值都高于对照组(P<0.005);ABR阈值与暴露时程逐步回归分析:24 h-click y=0.79x+83.81,R2=0.24;24 h—TB y=1.26x+90.76,R2=0.40;6 weeks—click y=1.26x+69.37,R2= 0.32;6 weeks—TB y=1.41x+82.33,R2=0.30;DPOAE只是在声暴露的早期有明显的变化,第3天和21天暴露组的幅值之间差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:随着噪声暴露时间的延长,听力下降恢复的可能性越小;引起暂时性阈移的最少噪声暴露时间是在3 d之内;ABR比DPOAE更能体现声损伤时程的变化情况,是研究长期噪声暴露的敏感客观指标。 Objective To investigate the shortest exposure time resulted in temporary threshold shift and a sensitive objective evaluated method in long term noise exposures, through exploring the effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditoiy brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in Rats. Methods Forty-two Wistar rats were divided into seven groups randomly; they were exposured to 115 dB SPL broad-band noise (12 h on/12 h off) for duration of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 21 days and the ABR and DPOAE 24 h after cessation of the noise and again after a period of 6 weeks were tested. Results ABR thresholds were significantly elevated in all exposure duration groups (P〈0. 005). The results of linear regression analysis between ABR threshold and the duration of noise exposure were as follows: 4 h-click y= 0. 79x+83.81, R^2 = 0. 24= 24 h-TB y=1. 26x+90.76, R^2=0.40;6 weeks-click y=1. 26x+69.37, R^2=0.32; 6 weeks-TBy=1. 41x+82.33, R^2= 0. 30; DPOAE response only showed significantly changes in early exposure duration. The magnitude of DPOAE in 3 d group was not significantly compared with that of 21 d group. Conclusion The longer is the time of noise exposure, the smaller of the possibility for the hearing to regain. The shortest exposure to noise that induced TTS is within three dayst ABR seems more sensitive to noise exposure duration than DPOAE.
出处 《吉林大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期26-30,共5页 Journal of Jilin University:Medicine Edition
基金 世界卫生组织(WHO)资助课题(H-16-133PBD)
关键词 噪声/副作用 听力/障碍 诱发电位 听觉 脑干 畸变产物耳声发射 noise/adverse effects evoked potentials, auditory, brain stem distortion product otoacoustic emissions
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Hotz MA, Probst R, Harris FP, et al. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions [J]. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 1093, 113: 478-482.
  • 2Freeman S, Khvoles R, Cherny L , et al. Effect of long term noise exposure on the developing and developed ear in the rat[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 1999, 4: 207-218.
  • 3刘淑芳,杜宝东,姬柏春.次声暴露对豚鼠听神经动作电位的影响[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2004,30(1):30-31. 被引量:7
  • 4王洪田,钟乃川.不同类型及强度的对侧声刺激对畸变产物耳声发射的影响[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2000,8(1):7-9. 被引量:5
  • 5Harding, Gary W, Bohn E, et al. Temporary DPOAE level shifts, ABR threshold shifts and histopathological damage following below critical-level noise exposures [J]. Hearing Res, 2004, 196:94- 108.
  • 6Liu GB. Functional development of the auditory brainstem in the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii) : the superior olivary complex and its relationship with the auditory brainstem response (ABR) [J]. Hearing Res, 2003, 175: 152-164.
  • 7Eddins AC, Zuskow M, Salvi RJ. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure[J]. Hearing Res, 1999, 127, 119-128.
  • 8Kakigi A, Hirakawa H, Harel N, et al. Comparison of distortion-product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with ABR threshold shift in chinchillas with ototoxic damage[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 1998, 25:223-232.
  • 9周娜,于黎明,李兴启.畸变产物耳声发射的正常值及探测音强度差对其的影响[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1999,13(7):305-306. 被引量:3
  • 10汪欣,刘淑芳,杜宝东.梅尼埃病患者耳蜗电图与听觉脑干诱发电位的关系[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2002,28(4):405-407. 被引量:1

二级参考文献26

共引文献12

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部