摘要
那些在最近的武装冲突中经历过并逃离有系统的强暴(及其他形式的性暴力)并向荷兰政府申请庇护的妇女与女孩在提出其庇护请求后并没有获得任何必要的医疗与心理救助。一般而言,难民们并没有被充分地告知庇护程序的内容。裁定难民身份的面谈(“详尽倾听”,Furtherhearings)的重要性尤其没有被明确告知。很少有难民知道这一面谈是他们能够解释其逃离理由的唯一时间和地点。此外,那些执行“详尽倾听”的移民与归化署的面试官往往是如此的执著于辨别“伪”难民以至于他们将妇女们的悲痛视为怀疑其可信性的良好理由。因此,在涉及强暴的难民身份面谈中,女性难民常常受到苛刻的对待。那些严重人权侵害的幸存者们在求助于荷兰的“创伤政策”时则遇到了更大的困难。这一法律工具所用的创伤概念使得它不足以对政治暴力幸存者提供保护。
Those women and girls who fled systematic rape and other forms of sexual violence in the recent armed conflicts and applied to the Netherlandish government for asylum haven＇t got any necessary medical and psychological aids. Generally speaking, the refugees are not fully informed of the asylum procedures; in particular, they are not informed of the importance of the interview called “Further Hearings” which is used to define the identity of the refugees. Few refugees understand that this interview is the only occasion for them to justify their seeking refuge. What＇s more, the interviewers of “Furthering Hearings” are so dedicated to telling the false victims from the true ones that they take the women＇s degree of grief as a judging criterion. Therefore, female refugees often suffer harsh treatment in these interviews, and the survivors of terrible violation of human rights encounter even greater difficulty when resorting to the Trauma Policy of Netherlands which cannot provide adequate protection for the survivors of political violence.
出处
《广西民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第1期73-81,共9页
Journal of Guangxi University For Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
