期刊文献+

B群人格障碍的人格五因素特征 被引量:4

Symptomatology of Cluster-B Personality Disorders from the Five-Factor Model Perspective
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解B群人格障碍的人格五因素特征。方法:先用人格障碍诊断问卷第四版(PDQ+4)在被试中筛查,再用个性障碍晤谈手册(PDI-IV)做半定式查询确定B群人格障碍患者,用NEO个性问卷(NEO-PI-R)做问卷测查。结果:66例B群人格障碍患者表现为高神经质(61.97±10.57)、低顺同性(38.39±11.46)和低严谨性(38.40±11.19),外向性(45.88±11.52)和开放性(45.00±9.30)得分接近低限。212例被试的PDI-Ⅵ和NEO-PI-R得分的多元相关分析显示,反社会型与顺同性负相关(r=-0.25,P<0.01),边缘型与神经质正相关(r=0.32,P<0.01),与顺同性和严谨性负相关(r=-0.22,P<0.01;r=-0.22,P<0.01),表演型与顺同性和严谨性负相关,(r=-0.16,P<0.05;r=-0.15,P<0.05),自恋型与顺同性负相关(r=-0.31,P<0.01)。结论:B群人格障碍患者的五因素人格特征较正常成年人有较大偏差,有较多的负性情绪体验,冲动,人际关系冷漠,缺乏自信等。本研究中B群人格障碍的五因素特征不典型。 Objective: To explore the symptomatology of cluster-B personality disorders from perspective of the Five-Factor Model (FFM) . Methods: PDQ^+4 wasadministered to college students and minor criminals to screen cluster-B subjects, Cluster-B patients were then diagnosed by conducting interview using PDI-Ⅳ. FFM of the subjects are measured with NEO-PI-R. Results: Cluster-B patients scored higher in Neurotieism (62. 0 ± 10. 6) , and lower in, Agreeableness (38.4 ± 11.5 ) and Conscientiousness ( 38.4 ± 11.2 ) than normal adult. Extraversion (45.9 ± 11.5 ) and Openness to Experience ( 45.0 ± 9. 3 ) are near the lower limits. Bivariate analysis between PDI-Ⅳ and NEO-PI-R showed that APD negatively correlated with Agreeableness ( r = -0. 25, P 〈0. 01 ), BPD positively correlated with Neurotieism ( r =0. 32, P 〈 0. 01 ), negatively, correlated with Extraversion, Agreeableness and Conscientiousness ( r = - 0. 15, P 〈 0. 05 ; r = - 0. 22, P 〈 0.01 ; r = - 0. 22, P 〈 0. 01 ), HPD negatively correlated with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness (r = -0. 16, P 〈 0. 05; r = -0. 15, P 〈 0. 05) , NPD negatively correlated with Agreeableness ( r = -0. 31, P 〈0.01 ) . Conclusion: FFM traits of cluster-B personality disorder exhibit abnormality compared to normal adults suggesting that they often experience negative emotion. They are more aggressive and have less self-confidence. The FFM traits of cluster-B personality disorders in this research are not as typical as that described by Thomas A. Widiger and Timothy J. Trull.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第4期264-267,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 B群人格障碍 横断面调查 人格五因素 NEO-PI-R cluster-B personality disorder, cross-sectional study, Five-Factor Model of Personality, NEO-PI-R
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Trull TJ.DSM-Ⅲ-R personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality:an empirical comparison.J Abnorm Psychol,1992,101:553 -560.
  • 2McCrae RR,John OP.An introduction to the five-factor model and its application.J Pers.1992,60:175 -215.
  • 3Widiger TA,Frances AJ.Toward a dimensional model for the personality disorders.In:Costa PT,Widiger TA,eds.Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality.Washington DC:American Psychological Association,2002.3-44.
  • 4马恩轩,赵万利,栾清明,曹中昌,成义仁.在监罪犯精神障碍流行学调查[J].山东精神医学,1998,11(2):12-14. 被引量:22
  • 5Steadman H J,Fabisiak S,Dvoskin J,et al.A survey of mental disability among state prison inmates.Hosp Community Psychiatry,1987,38 (10):1086-1090.
  • 6杨蕴萍,沈东郁,王久英,杨坚.人格障碍诊断问卷(PDQ-4+)在中国应用的信效度研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(3):165-168. 被引量:182
  • 7Widiger TA,Mangine S,Corbitt EM.个性晤谈-PDI-Ⅳ.杨坚.译.长沙:湖南医科大学临床心理学研究中心.1996.5-9.
  • 8戴晓阳,姚树桥,蔡太生,杨坚.NEO个性问卷修订本在中国的应用研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(3):171-174. 被引量:77
  • 9戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 10Raine A,Venables PH,Williams M.Relationships between central and autonomic measures of arousal at age 15 years and criminality at age 24 years.Arch Gen Psychiatry,1990,47:1003.

二级参考文献29

  • 1龚耀先.修订艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南医学院,1986..
  • 2周榕 陈红 杨炳钧 等译 PervinLA 著.人格科学[M].华东师范大学出版社,2001..
  • 3龚曜先.艾森克个性问卷手册[M].长沙:湖南医科大学,1986..
  • 4Bagby RM, Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR, et al. Replicating the five factor model of personality in a psychiatric sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999,27:1135 -1139
  • 5Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Work and personality: Use of the NEO-PI-R in industrial / organizational psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1996, 45(3):225-241
  • 6Shafer AB. Mediation of the Big Five's effect on career decision making by life task dimensions and on money attitudes by materialism. Personality and Individual Differences, 2000,28:93-109
  • 7Furnham A, Forde L, Ferrant K. Personality and work motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 1999, 27:1035-1043
  • 8Yang J, McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr, et al. Cross-cultural personality assessment in psychiatric populations: The NEO-PI-R in the People's Republic of China. Psychological Assessment, 1999, 11(3):359-368
  • 9Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. Major contributions to personality psychology. In S. Modgil, C. Modgil. Hans Eysenck: Consensus and Controversy. Philadelphia: Falmer, 1986. 63-72, 86
  • 10Costa PT Jr, McCrae RR. The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL, Psychological Assessment Resources,Inc. 1985

共引文献285

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部