期刊文献+

银行贷款风险定价的“翘板效应” 被引量:9

The Study on “the Seesaw Effect ” of the Loan Risk Pricing of the Bank
原文传递
导出
摘要 商业银行贷款的风险定价机制是利率市场化的核心,实现贷款利率的自主定价将是一个必然的发展趋势。目前中国各商业银行已广泛开展了客户信用等级评定工作,在此基础上如何进行贷款利率的风险定价并确定市场竞争的策略是亟待解决的问题。基于巴塞尔新资本协议内部评级法所使用的4个假设条件建立贷款的损失分布模型,并根据不同信用等级的债务人具有相同风险调整后的资本收益率得出银行贷款的风险定价具有“翘板效应”,即经营成本低的银行在对信用等级高的债务人放贷时有价格优势,可以收取相对(经营成本高的银行)较低的利率,而对于信用等级低的债务人放贷则要收取相对较高的利率,这对中国商业银行进行贷款市场细分并确定合理的市场竞争策略具有重要的指导意义。 This paper sets up a model of loan loss distribution on the base of Internal Ratings-based Approach of the New Basel Capital Accord. According to the same risk-adjusted return on capital of the debtor of different credit grades, the risk pricing of the loan has "the seesaw effect". Namely, the bank of low managing cost compared to the bank of high managing cost has the price superiority to loan the high credit rank debtor and may relatively gather a lower interest rate, but when making loans to low credit rank debtor, it must gather a relatively higher interest rate. The result is important to segment the loan market and confirm the rational market competitive strategy of the commercial bank of our country.
作者 梁凌 王修华
出处 《管理科学》 CSSCI 2006年第2期72-77,共6页 Journal of Management Science
关键词 巴塞尔新资本协议 内部评级法 贷款利率 风险定价 信用等级 the New Basel Capital Accord internal ratings-based approach loan interest rate risk pricing credit grade
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献29

  • 1张金良.贷款定价模式研究[J].金融会计,2000(9):11-15. 被引量:18
  • 2程果琦.我国商业银行实施内部评级法的难点和框架建议[J].上海金融,2005(2):27-29. 被引量:7
  • 3[1]Andrew H Chen, Sumon C Mazumdar, Yuxing Yan, Monitoring and bank loan pricing[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2000(8): 1~24.
  • 4[2]James T Fergus. Spatial variation in construction loan pricing at commercial banks [J]. Journal of housing Economics, 1995 (4):118~135.
  • 5[5]Peter S Rose, Commercial Bank Management[M]. 3thed. McGraw-Hill, 1996.
  • 6Artzner, F. Delbaen, J.-M. Eber, and D. Heath, Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance,9:203-228, 1999.
  • 7Tasche ,D. , Risk contributions and performance measurement working paper, Technische Universit "at M" unchen, 1999.
  • 8Denault,M. ,Coherent allocation of risk capital ,Journal of Risk, 4(1) :7-21, 2001.
  • 9Rockafellar, R.T. and S. Uryasev, Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss Dislributions,.Journal of Banking and Finance, 26:1443-1471, 2002.
  • 10Meyers, Glenn. , Coherent Measures of Risk AnExposilion for the Lay Actuary, 2000. http://www.casact.org/pubs/forum/00sforum/meyers/Coherent Measures of Risk. pdf.

共引文献63

同被引文献101

引证文献9

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部