摘要
亚当·斯密的分工劳动理论,是建立在商品存在的假设之上的。然而,为什么这样的假定会导致分工,斯密没有严格的论证,也不可能有严格的论证。马克思看到了这一点,然而他用生产力决定生产关系的哲学命题替代了这种论证。经济学上这种严格证明的欠缺,导致许多经济学家忽视工业革命的存在,而把自由放任主义应用到任何地方,华盛顿共识只是其中的一例。分工是由资产上的所有制革命产生的呢?还是由科学和技术的进化而产生?这篇论文提出了一个拓扑学的模型,以期解决这样一个分工的存在问题。
Adam Smith＇s labor division theory is based on the hypothesis of the existence of commodities. But how commodities make labor division possible？ Adam Smith has not proved it. In fact it is impossible to make a rigid proof in his work. Max thought that such a proof is necessary, but he used a philosophical proposition instead of the proof. That proposition is famous： productive forces determine production relations. The lack of rigid proof makes many economists take industrial revolution for granted, and apply laissez faire to everywhere, Washington Consensus is an example. Is labor division made by the revolution of the ownership of assets？ Or by the evolution of science and technology？ This essay puts forward a topological model to solve such a problem of existence.
出处
《华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第1期41-45,共5页
Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition
关键词
商品
分工
证明
拓扑学
微观经济学
commodity
labor division
proof
topology
microeconomics
