期刊文献+

限制分配模型预测黑麦草吸收PAHs 被引量:2

Prediction of PAHs Uptake by Ryegrass with a Partition-Limited Model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用水培体系检验了限制分配模型预测黑麦草同时吸收苊、芴、菲和芘4种多环芳烃(PAHs)的准确性.结果表明,限制分配模型能够较好地预测黑麦草吸收积累PAHs的程度.但由于该模型仅考虑根部传输,忽略了叶面吸收,导致模型对茎叶中PAHs含量预测的准确性较差.根系和茎叶的预测误差(预测值与实测值之差除以实测值的百分数)分别小于57.4%和98.5%.若考虑叶面吸收对模型预测的影响,则能显著降低茎叶中4种PAHs的预测误差.由于叶面吸收的影响随PAHs脂溶性升高而增大,预测误差降低程度为芘>菲>芴>苊,其中芘的最大预测误差由98.5%下降至69.4%. The performance of a partition-limited model on prediction of four PAHs (acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene and pyrene) uptake by ryegrass simultaneously was evaluated using a hydroponic system. Results suggest that the model has a good performance on prediction of PAlls uptake. However, the model focused on root translocation only, while excluded foliar uptake, which resulted in a poor performance on prediction of PAils in shoots. The differences of simulated and experimented concentrations of PAHs were less than 57.4% for roots and less than 98.5% for shoots respectively. If the influence of foliar uptake on the performance of the model was taken into account, the differences for all the four PAHs would be reduced significantly. Since the influence of foliar uptake increased with the increase of the hydrophobic property of the PAHs, the differences decreased with an order of pyrene〉 phenanthrene〉 fluorene〉 acenaphthene, among which the maximum difference for pyrene decreased from 98.5 % down to 69.4%.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第6期1212-1216,共5页 Environmental Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(20337010) 国家杰出青年基金项目(20125719) 国家重点基础研究发展规划(973)项目(2003CB415004)
关键词 限制分配模型 黑麦草 PAHS 吸收 partition-limited model ryegrass PAils uptake
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献9

  • 1Ou Z Q,Chemosphere,1995年,30卷,2期,313页
  • 2Greenberg A, Yokoyama R, Giorgio P, Cannora F. Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the airborne par ticulates of urban New Jersey (USA). Environ. Sci. Technol., 1981, 14: 895~902.
  • 3Venkataraman C, Sheldon K F. Source resolution of fine particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using a receptor model modified for reactivity. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. , 1994, 44: 1103~1108.
  • 4Matt F S, Steven J E, Paul J L. Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and Lake Michigan. Atmos. Environ., 1999,33: 5071~5079.
  • 5Mitra S, Ray B. Patterns and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their derivatives in indoor air. Atmos. Environ., 1995, 29: 3345~3356.
  • 6Gundel L A, Mahanama K R R, Daisey J M. Semivolatile and particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in environmental tobacco smoke: cleanup, speciation, and emission factors. Environ. Sci. Technol. , 1995, 29: 1607~1614.
  • 7李滢,区自清,孙铁珩.^(14)C-菲在营养液-火山石-小麦有控系统中的迁移和转化[J].应用生态学报,1998,9(3):318-322. 被引量:3
  • 8沈学优,刘勇建,沈红心,朱利中.高效液相色谱自动分析空气中痕量多环芳烃[J].应用化学,1999,16(5):79-81. 被引量:10
  • 9朱利中,刘勇建,沈学优,沈红心.城市道路交通PAHs污染现状及来源解析[J].环境科学学报,2000,20(2):183-186. 被引量:38

共引文献29

同被引文献56

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部